Jelejar Hormosji Gotla Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Decided On : Sep-30-1964

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: the Hyderabad Act', the Code of Civil Procedure, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, Constitution, the Indian Code of, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Government Act, the Government Act V of 1320 Fasli, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Indian Code, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Indian Constitution, the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, the Hyderabad Act, The Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Indian Code of Civil Procedure, the Hyderabad Act, the States Reorganisation Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Legal Adviser of the Government of Hyderabad, the Legal Adviser of the Government, Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, Central Act 11, Chapter or section of any, Central Act 11, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, section 80, Article 300 of the Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 300, Constitution, the Hyderabad Act, S. 80, Constitution, Article 300, The Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Code Civil Procedure (Amendment, Section 4, Section 4, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Amendment Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Hyderabad Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, Article 62, the Limitation Act, section 80, the Hyderabad Act, the Amendment Act, Section 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act, the Hyderabad Act

ORG: ORDERSatyanarayana Raju, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the Hyderabad Suits Against Government Act, State of Hyderabad, Government of Hyderabad, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the High Court, Manohar Pershad, the High Court, Government, Government, the State of Hyderabad, Court, Government, S. 80 C. P. C., the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the supreme Court, Court, the Hyderabad Act.(7, S. 4 C. P. C., the State of Hyderabad, Government, Government, Hyderabad, the Indian Union, the State of Hyderabad, S. 80, the Hyderabad Civil Procedure Code, State of Hyderabad, the State of Hyderabad, Nizam, the Indian Union, Hyderabad, the Indian Union, State of Hyderabad, the State of Andhra, the State of Andhra, Nizam's Government, the Hyderabad Government, the Government of Hyderabad, Government, Hyderabad, Court, Court, Nizam, Nizam, Nizam's Government, Court, Nizam, Nizam, State, Authority, the Hyderabad Civil Procedure Code, Hyderabad State, State, Hyderabad, the Hyderabad Civil Procedure Code.(17, Nizam, the Supreme Court, AIR 1953 SC 245, Crown, S. 80, S. 80, the Government of India, Lordships, Solicitor-General, Crown, The Government of India, the Union of India, State, State, Parliament, Legislature, State, the Dominion of India, the Dominion of India, the Union of India, Dominion, State, the Crown Proceedings Act, Government, the Union of India, State, Government, Government.(21, Court, Kaki Lachmiah v. State of Hyderabad, AIR, Andh Pra, S. 80 C.P.C., Legislature, Government, litigation.(22, the State of Hyderabad, the Indian Union, S. 439, the Hyderabad Civil Procedure Code, Government Pleader, the State of Hyderabad, the Hyderabad Suits against Government Act, Civil Procedure, the Hyderabad State, the Hyderabad Suits against Government Act, Material, Nizam, Nizam, Raj Pramukh, State, Hyderabad, Advise, Government, the Hyderabad Legislature, Court, Government, AIR 1958, Andh Pra, the Hyderabad Suits Against, Departments of the State, State, State, Judgment of a Division Bench, Court, Judges of, Government, Judges of, S. 80 C.P.C., the Suits Against Government Act V, Government, C.P.C.'(38, Government, the Hyderabad Suits Against Government Act, operation.(41, Court, Court

ORDINAL: First, First, first, first

DATE: April 1951.(3, July 23, 1953, November 23, 1953, the year 1955, October 18, 1958, November 8, 1962, June, 19, 1963.(5, the year 1955, 1951, March 28, 1911, About four years, January 26, 1950, some years, April 1, 1951, April 29, 1955, 1955, 1956, 30 days, 1951, 1951, February 17, 1951, two days later, 1951, 1908, 1951, 11859, the year 1859, the year 1859, 1947, 1958, 1951, 1955, 1908, 1955, the year 1954, the year 1962, December 1949, February 1950, January 5, 1951, April 1951.'(35, 1955, June, 4, 1949, November 15, 1951, February 9, 1952, three years, October 15, 1947, the period of three years, October 15, 1950, November 1949, three years, three years, 1908, 1951

CARDINAL: 4,00,000, 1,50,000, two, 1, 2, 4, 5., 2, 11, One, roughly nine, 4., 5., 6, 7, 8, 9, 2, 1, 3, 20, one, 80, 2, 19, one, 2, 1, 1955.(28, 12, three, 311, 14, two, 300, 3, 1951.(36, 16-4-1962

GPE: O.S., P.C., the Indian Union, the Indian Union, C.P.C., Extraordinary, India, India, India, India, Province, England, India, C.P.C., Art, States, Art, Srinivasachari, Munikanniah

PERSON: Narasimham JJ, Pleader, Sri N. V. B. Sankara Rao, Pleader, Sri V. K. Vaidya, C. P. C., C. P. C., Districts, Madar, Sri Vaidya, Sri Vaidya, Pleader, Pleader, Abdul Majid, Mode, Mohammed Ahmed Ansari, Jaganmohan Reddy, Andhra Pradesh, Pleader, Bill No, Bhandari C. J., Mohindra Singh, Pleader, Sri Sankara Rai, Art, available.(33, Pleader, Mohammed Ahmed Ansari, Jaganmohan Reddy, Departments

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

FAC: the Gazette of India

PRODUCT: Hyderabad Act, Hyderabad Act

LOC: S.4, Mt. Harbhajan Kaur

WORK_OF_ART: Repealing and Amending Acts