Sarvaraya Textiles Limited Vs. Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Commission, Hyderabad and ors.

Decided On : Nov-08-2001

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: the EPF Act', Section 3(1)(o, the EPF Act, Section 22(1, Section 22(1, Section 22, the Income Tax Act, Section 14-B of the EPF Act, Section 15(1, Section 16(1, Section 17, Section 16, Section 17(3, Section 16(2, Section 18, Section 18(4, Section 22, Section 22, Section 16, Section 17, Section 25, the Companies Act, Section 22, Section 16, Section 17, Section 25, the Companies Act, Section 32, The EPF Act, the EPF Act, Section 5-A of EPF Act, Section 6 of EPF Act, Section 8, Section 8A, Section 8, the Income Tax Act, Section 8, Section 15, Section 17, Section 17, Section 4, Section 14-B of the Act, Section 14-B, the EPF Act, Section 22(1, under EPF Act, Section 14-B of the Act, Section 14-B, Section 22, Section 29, Section 22(1, Section 22(1, Section 29, Section 22(1, Section 29(1, Section 22(1, Section 129, Section 22(1, Section 16, Section 22, Section 22(1, Section 22(1, Section 22, Section 22, Section 22, Section 22, Section 25, Section 22(1, Section 22, Section 22(1, Section 22, the Rent Control Act, Section 22(1, Section 22(1, Section 22(1, Section 22, Section 22(1, Section 22(1, the Provident Scheme, the EPF Act, Section 22(1, the EFP Act, Act 33 of 1988, Section 14-B, Section 14-B, Section 14-B, the EPF Act, the EPF Act, Section 14-B of EPF Act, Para 32-B of EPF Act, Section 14-B of EFP Act, Section 22(1, Article, the EPF Act, Constitution, Section 22(1, Section 22(1, the EPF Act, Section 22(1, Article 21 of the Constitution.34, Section 138, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 22(1, the Negotiable Instruments Act.35, Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, Section 22, Section 22-A, the Companies Act, Section 34, Section 32, Section 46B, Section 34, the Companies Act, Section 22(1, the EPF Act, Section 22(1

ORG: S.B. Sinha, the Employees Provident Fund Miscellaneous Provisions Act, the Sick industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, the Employees Provided Fund Scheme, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, EPF, the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, the Apex Court, Maharashtra Tubes, Maharashtra Tubes v. SIIC, Organo Chemical Industries v. Union of India, AIR 1979 SC, Court, VSR, Counsel, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, Counsel, Provided Fund, the Provided Fund, the Central Provided Fund, Board, the Central Government, the Reserve Bank of India, Authority, Supreme Court, the Government of India, Board of Directors, Board, Board, Board, Board, Employees, the Central Board, the Income Tax (Certificate Proceedings) Rules, the Insurance Fund, the Central Provident Fund, the Central Government, the Official Gazette, the Central Board, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, --The Central Board, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, nature.18, the Apex Court, Maharashtra Tubes, the State Financial Corporation Act, The Apex Court, the State Financial Corporation Act, the State Financial Corporation Act, the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, The Apex Court, the Board under Sections 16 and, Board, Board, The Board, Coromandal Pharmaceuticals, the Apex Court, The Supreme Court, Tata Davy Limited, Orissa Sales Tax Act, The Apex Court, Gujarat Steel Tube Company Limited, AIR1999SC3839, the Apex Court, the Karnataka Rent Control Act, Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd v., Church of South India Trust Association, the Apex Court, CApex Court, the Apex Court, Board, The Apex Court, Tata Davy Limited's, the Central Provident Fund, the Central Board, Parliament, the PF Fund, EPF, the Central Board, EPF, the Central Board, Organo Chemical Industries v. Union of India, AIR 1979 SC, the Apex Court, the Provident Fund, the Provident Fund, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, State, The Apex Court, State, the Apex Court, Court, the European Court of Human Rights, Court, Scheme, Maharashtra Tubes Case, the Apex Court, Organo Chemical Industries, Court, VSR, Government Departments, A.P., Absorption of Employees of State Government Public Sector Undertakings, Court, the State Government, RPF, the High Court, Provident Fund, BSL Limited, Gift Holdings Private Limited, the Apex Court, Pennar Peterson Securities Limited, Maharashtra Tabes Limited, State Industrial and Investment Corporation of India, the Finance Corporation Act, the Sick Industries Companies (Special Provisions, Supreme Court, High Courts, the Provident Fund Scheme, Court, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, EPF, ESIC, EPF, ESIC, EPF, ESIC, EPF, EPF, ESIC, EPF, EPF, ESIC, Clauses, EPF, ESIC, EPF, ESIC, AAIR, the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction

CARDINAL: 5, 8, 1,63,775-55, 5, three, 78, 803, 1990]1SCR966, 5, about six thousand, 38, one, 1, 2, 3, 8, 2, 5, 14, up to 100, up to, 15, 17, 1, 20, 1997]2SCR1026, 111, 1992]2SCR999, BIFR.25, 1, 2, up to 100, 41, 41, 31, 192, 1, 192, 2000CriLJ1464, 2000]2SCR1102, two, two, 243, 27-9-2001, 1-4-2001, 1, 31-3-2001

ORDINAL: 3rd, 3rd, second, Second, second, second

DATE: 1952, 1985, 1952, November, 1992 to, November, 2000, the same day, monthly, 1993, Submissions:6, 1803, 1997, 1952, less than seven years, two consecutive years, the end of the second financial year, sixty days, the financial year, 1993, 1956, 1 of 1956, 1956, 1952, arrear, 1961, 1985, 1986, Para 38, fifteen days, 1952, 15 days, 1952, monthly, 1951, 1998, 1947, Para 32, 1803, 39, Articles 39, winter, 1997, 14 of 1997, 14 of 1997, 2001, 15 days, 1956, 1951, 1985, 1951, 1985, 1951, 2001, one month, three months, one month, three months, 40

GPE: New Delhi, Counsel, Counsel, Orissa, Bombay, maintainable.36, Allahabad Bank, New Delhi, New Delhi

PERSON: Question:5, Gram Panchayat v. Shree Vallabh Glass Works Limited, Sri C. Kodanada, Ram, Gram Panchayat v. Shree Vallabh Glass Works Limited, R.N. Reddy, Paragraphs 32, Gram Panchayat v. Shree Vallabh Glass Works Limited, Gram Panchayat, Virchandbhai B. Shah, Gram Panchayat's, Ralliwolf Limited, Kusum Ingots, Alloys Limited, Canara Bank, Ahmadi, Krishna Mohan, Further

NORP: Maharashtra, Maharashtra, tax.14B5-A14-B14-BPower

PRODUCT: Murthy v. Engineer-in-Chief, STC 462, Para 32-B of the Scheme, Murthy v. Engineer-in-Chief, Section 138, Section 138, the RDB Act

MONEY: fifty per cent, 50 per cent

WORK_OF_ART: the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the industrial, the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company

PERCENT: 8 1/3%, 6 1/4%

EVENT: the Sunday Times Case

FAC: Hyderabad Allwyn Limited

TIME: 9-10-2001