The Commissioner of Central Vs. Challenger Rubbers (P) Ltd., - Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Decided on: Mar-22-2006
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
LAW: Section 11AC, the Central Excise Act &, Rule 173Q, Rule 173Q
CARDINAL: 1, three, three, 11, 13/2003, three, three, 5, 6, 5, 81,085/-, 2930, 19.8.99, 1.2.95, 17.8.99, 2930, 10.8.99, 306, 10.8.99, 104, 1.2.95, 17.8.99, 19.8.99, 17.8.99, 18.8.99, one, 11, 445, one, two, 2, 4, 2, 6, 7, 10,000/-, 145, 1023, one, 3., 4., 10,000/-
DATE: 31.03.2003, 31.03.2003, 27.9.99, 1995, 1283, 1284/2005, 25.07.2005, 1283, 1284/2005, 1284/2005, 25.07.2005, 2001, 1,50,548/
ORG: Additional, Section 11AC &, SDR, the Commissioner (Appeals, Quality Rubber Ltd., Tribunal, OIO, Party, Final Order No, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Final Order No.1283 &, Learned Counsel, Tribunal, Devi Rubber Products and Ors, CCE, Tribunal, the Devi Rubber Industries(supra
QUANTITY: 8371 kgs, 3000 kg
PERSON: 81,085/-, Bill No, George Varughese v. Collector of Central Excise, Sulphur, Final Order Nos
PRODUCT: Rule 173Q
GPE: any.6