Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shrinath Travel Agency Vs. Cce

Decided On : Jan-23-2006

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Section 76, Section 76, Motor Vehicle Act, Section 65, Chapter V of Finance Act, Section 65, the Finance Act, Motor Vehicle Act, Section 65(5 0 of the Act, Section 2, Motor Vehicle Act

CARDINAL: 2, 19.10.2000, 1.4.2000 to 19.10.2000, 32,29,360/-, 22.11.2000, 12, 78, 2,000/-, 14.2000, 12, 22.11.2000, 1.4.2000, 43, 9/1 1.4.2001

NORP: Central Excise

ORG: Tour Operator Services, Shri Satya Najayan Sharma, Asstt, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Superintendent (Service Tax, Working, Shri Satya, Shri Satya, SDR, Shri Satya, The Commissioner (Appeals, The Commissioner (Appeals, the Regional Transport Office, the Directorate of Service Tax, Shri Satya, Shri Satya Naiayan Sharma, Shri Satya, the Commissioner (Appeals

PERCENT: 5%, 5%, 10%, 5%, 5%, 5%

PERSON: Shri Shyam, Lal Kabra, Shri Shyam, Lal Kabra, Shri Shyam, Lal Kabra, Narayan Sharma, correct.5, Shri Satya, Clerk, Appellants, Narayan Sharma, Shri Kabra, Shri Shyam, Lal Kabra, Shri Shyam, Lal Kabra, Shri Satya, Narayan Sharma, Shri Shyam, Lal Kabra, Narayari Sharma, Narayan Shaima, Shri Shyam, Lal Kabra

DATE: 77, 1994, 77, 78, 1994, 10.9.2001, 1988, 1988

GPE: Clause, subcontractor'.7

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //