Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Customs Vs. Colourtex
Decided On : Dec-06-2005
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
LAW: Section 129A, the Customs Act, Section 129C(5, the Customs Act, Section 113(d, the Customs Act, Section 13
CARDINAL: 1, two, one, 5, 22, 25, 12,800/-, 1, 2, two, two, one
ORG: the Commissioner of Customs, the Member (Technical, Member (Technical, Special Leave Application, Tribunal, the High Court, the Special Leave Application, MA/2981/05.MA/3100.05, Bench, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Learned Senior Counsel, Tribunal, CC, Ahmedabad v.Shipping Corporation of India Ltd., R.K. Motors, Bombay v. CC, ELT, Member (Technical, the Member (Technical, the Allahabad High Court, CIT Bihar, Judicial, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Judicial, Member (Technical, the Allahabad High Court, The High Court, Bench, The High Court, M/s. Colourtex
DATE: 26.12.2003, 20th October, 2005, 11th of November, 2005, October, 2005, 1988
GPE: Mumbai, India, Bombay, Birendra, Hanutram Chandanmul v., Birendra, Birendra
NORP: Hon'ble, Hon'ble, Hon'ble, ITAT, Hon'ble
ORDINAL: third, third, third, 10th, 24th, first, third, third, third, third, third, first, third, third, third, third, third, first, second, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third
PRODUCT: Consultant, 727
PERSON: Kumar Rai v.UOI, Orissa, Amar Pal Singh v. Election Commission, Kumar Rai, Kumar Rai
FAC: the Writ Petition