Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Jayaswals Neco Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Decided On : Aug-18-2005
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
LAW: the Finance Act, Section 112.3, Section 127(1, the Finance Act, Section 112
CARDINAL: 1, 20, 4,182, 2,046, 20,000, 20,000, 1,66,18,563/-, 84,74,128/-, 26-5-2000, 30/97, 7, 69/2000, 26-5-2000, 6-5-98, 81/98, 22/98, 81/98, 69/2000, 19-5-2000, 69/2000, 69/2000, 69/2000, 30/97, 7, 1-3-2002, 3, 132, 257, 30/97
ORG: Coke, MT, Basic Customs Duty and Rs, BCD, Special Customs Duty, SCD, Special Additional Duty, SCD, SCD, Section 127(1, SI, BCD, Coke, BCD, Department, BCD, Coke, Board, CESTAT, MT, CESTAT, CESTAT, Paragraph 5 in Notification No, CESTAT, CESTAT, SI, SCD, BCD, Budget Circulars of 2002, Budget Circular, SCD, BCD, SCN, SDR, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Jagdish Cancer and Research Centre - 2001, SCD, BCD, BCD, BCD, BCD
WORK_OF_ART: MT of Pig Iron, MT of Pig Iron, Notification No.30/97
PERCENT: only 12%, 24%, 24%, 15%, 15%, 24%, 24%, 15%, 24%
DATE: 2003, the period June 1998 to August 1998, 4673, 19-5-2000, 2003, 2003, 2003, 2002, the impugned period June 1998 to August 1998, 2002, 2002, 2002
GPE: MT, US, C.C., Mumbai, S.C., demanded.10
PERSON: Bill