Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jayaswals Neco Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Decided On : Aug-18-2005

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

LAW: the Finance Act, Section 112.3, Section 127(1, the Finance Act, Section 112

CARDINAL: 1, 20, 4,182, 2,046, 20,000, 20,000, 1,66,18,563/-, 84,74,128/-, 26-5-2000, 30/97, 7, 69/2000, 26-5-2000, 6-5-98, 81/98, 22/98, 81/98, 69/2000, 19-5-2000, 69/2000, 69/2000, 69/2000, 30/97, 7, 1-3-2002, 3, 132, 257, 30/97

ORG: Coke, MT, Basic Customs Duty and Rs, BCD, Special Customs Duty, SCD, Special Additional Duty, SCD, SCD, Section 127(1, SI, BCD, Coke, BCD, Department, BCD, Coke, Board, CESTAT, MT, CESTAT, CESTAT, Paragraph 5 in Notification No, CESTAT, CESTAT, SI, SCD, BCD, Budget Circulars of 2002, Budget Circular, SCD, BCD, SCN, SDR, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Jagdish Cancer and Research Centre - 2001, SCD, BCD, BCD, BCD, BCD

WORK_OF_ART: MT of Pig Iron, MT of Pig Iron, Notification No.30/97

PERCENT: only 12%, 24%, 24%, 15%, 15%, 24%, 24%, 15%, 24%

DATE: 2003, the period June 1998 to August 1998, 4673, 19-5-2000, 2003, 2003, 2003, 2002, the impugned period June 1998 to August 1998, 2002, 2002, 2002

GPE: MT, US, C.C., Mumbai, S.C., demanded.10

PERSON: Bill

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //