M.G. Electronics Vs. Cce - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jun-27-2005

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Section 11A, the Finance Act, Section 110 of the Finance Act, Section XVI

CARDINAL: 1, 8113-8114, 2, 3/MGE/89, 6, 85.25, 85.29, 8529.00, 8504.00, 3,99,516,33, 1,7,89 to 19.1.90, 3,99,516.33, 1435/99, 12.5.2000, 41/2001, 4.5.2001, 85, 84.85, 85.48, one, 34, 2(a, 110, 85.04

ORG: the Supreme Court, C A No, Tribunal, Court, Cotspun, Deflection, T.V., Linearity Coil, EHT, SMPS, the Additional Collector, the Tribunal under Final Order No, the Commissioner of Central Excise, the Tribunal under Misc, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Central Excise Tariff, Chapters 84 &, CCE, Baroda v. Cotspum Ltd., RLT, the Central Excise Tariff, the Headings of Chapters 84, SDR, ITW Signode India Ltd., Parliament

DATE: 2001, 2000, 1999, 85, 1944, a period of past six months

PERSON: Line Driver, Width Coil, Meerut, Nos

PERCENT: 15%, 5%

GPE: valorem

WORK_OF_ART: Final Order No, Collector of Central Excise

PRODUCT: Section XVI, merits.4