Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Suvardhan Vs. Cit
Decided On : Aug-04-2006
Court : Karnataka
LAW: section 45(4, section 45(4, the Income Tax Act, section 45(4, the Income Tax Act, section 45(4, the Income Tax Act, section 48, section 45(4, section 47, the Income Tax Act, Section 47, section 47, section 45, section 47(2, the Finance Act, section 47, section 47, section 45, section 47, section 45(4, section 2(47, section 45, the Income Tax Act, The Finance Act, section 47
ORG: ORDERGururajan, J. M/s. Suvardhan of, Tribunal, Notice, Nil, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Sri M.V. Seshachala, the Appellate Tribunal, under:'(2, Madhya Pradesh High Court, CIT, the Bombay High Court, CIT, A.N. Naik Associates, Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, Parliament
PERSON: Bangalore, Anuradha, Heard Sri Parthasarathi, Sri Parthasarathi, Sri Parthasarathi.8, Sri Parthasarathi, Sri Seshachala
CARDINAL: 405, 22-12-1997.2, 23, three, 1, two, 17-10-1988, 1, 1, 3, 31-3-1992, one, 1-4-1988, 1-4-1988, 2006]281ITR52(MP, 1-4-1988, 2004]265ITR346(Bom, 4, 1, 347)Bombay, 1-4-1988, 347)9
DATE: 1997, 1961, the previous year, 1987, 1987, 1987
GPE: Assessee