Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Suvardhan Vs. Cit

Decided On : Aug-04-2006

Court : Karnataka

LAW: section 45(4, section 45(4, the Income Tax Act, section 45(4, the Income Tax Act, section 45(4, the Income Tax Act, section 48, section 45(4, section 47, the Income Tax Act, Section 47, section 47, section 45, section 47(2, the Finance Act, section 47, section 47, section 45, section 47, section 45(4, section 2(47, section 45, the Income Tax Act, The Finance Act, section 47

ORG: ORDERGururajan, J. M/s. Suvardhan of, Tribunal, Notice, Nil, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Sri M.V. Seshachala, the Appellate Tribunal, under:'(2, Madhya Pradesh High Court, CIT, the Bombay High Court, CIT, A.N. Naik Associates, Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, Parliament

PERSON: Bangalore, Anuradha, Heard Sri Parthasarathi, Sri Parthasarathi, Sri Parthasarathi.8, Sri Parthasarathi, Sri Seshachala

CARDINAL: 405, 22-12-1997.2, 23, three, 1, two, 17-10-1988, 1, 1, 3, 31-3-1992, one, 1-4-1988, 1-4-1988, 2006]281ITR52(MP, 1-4-1988, 2004]265ITR346(Bom, 4, 1, 347)Bombay, 1-4-1988, 347)9

DATE: 1997, 1961, the previous year, 1987, 1987, 1987

GPE: Assessee

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //