Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mc. Dowell and Co. Ltd.
Decided On : Jun-22-2006
Court : Karnataka
LAW: Section 256(1, Section 143(1)(a, the IT Act 2, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143 of the Income Tax Act, Section 143, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143 of the Act, Section 143, the I.T. Act, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143, Section 143
ORG: ORDERR, The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Branch, Tribunal, Tribunal, Assessing, Corporate Guarantee Obligation', Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Company, Counsel, U.B. Elostomers Ltd., M/s. U.B. Elostomers Ltd., M/s. U.B. Elostomers Ltd., Tribunal, Tribunal, the Corporate Guarantee Obligation, Tribunal, Guarantee Obligation, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal, Act.10, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, Judgment, Central Board of Direct Taxes and Ors
CARDINAL: 1, 18,67,21,730/-, three, 1956]30ITR174(SC, 1996]218ITR298(KAR
PERSON: 18,67,21,730/-, Heard Sri, Sri, facie, facie, facie, Madan Gopal Bagla v. Commissioner of, Granites
DATE: 1994.-95
GPE: Counsel, West Bengal
ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first