Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mc. Dowell and Co. Ltd.

Decided On : Jun-22-2006

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 256(1, Section 143(1)(a, the IT Act 2, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143 of the Income Tax Act, Section 143, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143 of the Act, Section 143, the I.T. Act, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143, Section 143

ORG: ORDERR, The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Branch, Tribunal, Tribunal, Assessing, Corporate Guarantee Obligation', Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Company, Counsel, U.B. Elostomers Ltd., M/s. U.B. Elostomers Ltd., M/s. U.B. Elostomers Ltd., Tribunal, Tribunal, the Corporate Guarantee Obligation, Tribunal, Guarantee Obligation, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal, Act.10, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, Judgment, Central Board of Direct Taxes and Ors

CARDINAL: 1, 18,67,21,730/-, three, 1956]30ITR174(SC, 1996]218ITR298(KAR

PERSON: 18,67,21,730/-, Heard Sri, Sri, facie, facie, facie, Madan Gopal Bagla v. Commissioner of, Granites

DATE: 1994.-95

GPE: Counsel, West Bengal

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //