Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Damini Printers (P) Ltd., Mb Dyers Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Decided On : Apr-11-2005
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: Chapter 52, Chapter 54, Chapter 55, Rule 57, Circular, Rule 11, Rule 11, the Notification No.6/2002 NT, Rule 11, Rule 11, Rule 11
CARDINAL: 1, 22.7.1996, thousands, 3, 23.7.96, 23.7.96, 31.3.2000, 59, 282, 3.9.96, 4, 2, 52.07, 55.14, 2, 37, 501, 5, 11, thousands, No.2, 2, 3, 172, 545, 7/2001, three
ORG: M/s. Damini Printers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. MB Dyers, Advocate, M/s Damini Printers and M/s. MB Dyers, MM Fabrics, Department, MODVAT, Budget, Budget, MODVAT Scheme, Budget, Finance, Textile Sector, MODVAT, Speech, Finance, Learned Advocate, Budget, the Central Government, Central Government, CE, the Central Board of Excise &, Customs, Circular, Board, MODVAT, MODVAT, CENVAT Credit Rules, the Central Government, the Central Government, grey, Ashok Silk Mills, CCE, RLT 702, Mangal Textile Mills, CCE Ahmedabad, Board Circular, Appellants, Reliance, Jawahar Mills Industries, CCE, Learned Senior Departmental Representative, S. No, the Supreme Court, the State Novopon India Ltd., CCE, ELT, SC, Reliance, CCE, the Larger Bench, the Central Government, the Central Government, Headings, MODVAT, the Budget Speech, the Budget Speech, Board, Circular, the Central Government, the Allahabad High Court, Kampur Industries Gases Ltd., ELT, Courts, Legislature, Tribunal, CE, Mangal Taxtile Mills India Ltd., the Board Circular, Ashok Silk Mills, Tribunal
PERSON: Ali, Shri V. R Sethi, Schedule, Notification, Notification, Shri O.P. Arora, Charul Barnwal, Appellants, Appellants, Larger Bench, para 4.5, Notification, wherein
FAC: the Lok Sabha, 22.7.96
DATE: Para 123, Para 124, Para 4.5, 2001, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2003, 54, 1994 73, 2000, 2002, 2002, 1996-97, 2004
NORP: Central Excise
PERCENT: 5%, 10%, 50%, 50%
GPE: Mumbai, Headings
PRODUCT: 769, Circular
LOC: the Notification Following