Diamond Feeds Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Asst. Ii) and ors.

Decided On : Sep-29-2005

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 9, Section 8A, the KST Act', the CST Act', Section 6, Section 21(2, Section 8A, the KST Act, the KST Act, Section 8A, the KST Act, the CST Act, the KST Act, the CST Act, Section 5, the KST Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 6, Section 6B of the Act, the KST Act, the CST Act, Section 7 of the Bihar Finance Act, Section 7, Section 7, Section 7 of the Bihar Finance Act, Section 7 of the Bihar Finance Act, Section 2(1)(u, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5C, Section 6 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Sales Tax Law', the Sale of Goods Act, Section 5 of the Act

ORG: Dattu, the State Government, the State Government, Suffice, the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, SPC 93, the State Government, Counsel Sri T.N. Keshava Murthy, the Government of Karnataka, SPC 93, KST/CST, Counsel, the Finance Department, the Finance Department, the Finance Department, the State Government, KST, CST, The State Government, KST/CST, Ceilingyears, the State Level Co-ordination Committee, Commerce and Industries Department, the Government of Karnataka, the State Government, Counsel, the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, KST, Counsel, State of Bihar v. Suprabhat Steel Ltd., STC, Counsel, Brooke Bond Upton India Limited, Unique Creations (Bangalore) Ltd., the State Government, the State of Karnataka.13, Additional Government Advocate, Additional Government Advocate, Additional Government Advocate, Government, Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Supreme Court, Suprabhat Steel Ltd.'s, STC, the State Government, the Finance Department, the State Government, the State Government, Suprabhat Steel Ltd.'s, STC, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Industrial Incentive Policy, the State Government, Cabinet, the State Government, the Finance Department, the Industrial Policy, the Government Order, Government, the Industrial Incentive Policy of, the State Government of Bihar, Industrial Promotion Policy, the High Court, the Industrial Incentive Policy of, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the State Government, the State Government, The Karnataka Sales Tax Act, State, New Industrial Policy, KST/CST, the Industrial Policy, KST/CST, KST/CST, Counsel, Counsel, State, the Supreme Court, STC 430, inter vivos, KST, CST Acts, Legislature, State, Government, State, the New Industrial Policy of the State Government, the State Government, the State Government

NORP: J.1, contra

PERSON: Sri Shylendra, W. P. No, Sri Keshava Murthy, para 7).Under Clause, Sri Keshava Murthy, Sri Keshava Murthy, Devi Dass Gopal, Sri Keshava Murthy

DATE: July 15, 2004, 1961, September 23, 1993, 1993-98, 1957, 1956, July 12, 1993, a period of, six years, annual, April 1, 1999 to March 31, 2000, 1,88,37,759, July 12, 1993, 2002, the assessment year April 1, 1999 to March 31, 2003, April 1, 1998 to March 31, 1999, 1993-98, July 12, 1993, August 28, 1993, July 12, 1993, the years 1993-98, years, August, September 23,1993, 1957, 1957, 1999, 1998, 2001, July 24, 2003, 2004, the years 1993-98, 1999, 1999, 1981, 10.4(i, March 1, 1993 and, March 31, 1998, a period of 7 years, April 1, 1993, a period of, 7 years, April 1, 1993, April 2, 1994, 1981, April 1, 1993, 1993, 1993, April 1, 1993 and, March 31, 1998, April 1, 1993, April 1, 1993, a period of, seven years, 1981, the years 1993-1998, 1967, years, years, the years 1993-1998, the years 1993-1998, August 28, 1993

CARDINAL: two, 3., two, 140, up to, 5059, 2000.6, 69, 140, 171, 5.0, one, 6, 6, 8), 1, 171, 2, 3, 4, 1, 112, 258, 109, 265, 135, 213, 112, 112, 258, 15, 15, 15, 10.4, 15, 16, two, 20

MONEY: 100 per cent

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first

PRODUCT: CSL 93(I, Medium, Rule 20C, Schedule

GPE: the State of Karnataka, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Karnataka, Karnataka, Counsel, Smt, Clause, Krishnan v. State of Punjab

PERCENT: 4 100%, 4 100%, 6 100%, 5 100%, 7 100%, 6 100%