Monika Sanctis Vs. Henry Joseph and anr.

Decided On : Dec-17-2002

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 55, the Indian Divorce Act, Section 19, the Family Court Act, Sections 10 and 11, the Divorce Act, Section 10 of the Act, Section 10, the Divorce Act, Section 16 of the Act, Section 16 of the Act, Section 10 of the Act, Section 16, the Divorce Act, Section 16, the Divorce Act, the Indian Divorce Act, Act 51 of 2001, the Amending Act, Section 10, the Divorce Act, the Divorce Act, Section 10, the Divorce Act, the Indian Divorce Act, Section 10 of the Act, Section 10 of the Act, Section 10 of the Act, Section 10, Section 10, Section 11, Section 10, Section 13 of the Act, Section 14, Section 15 of the Act, Section 10, Section 16 of the Act, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17-A of the Act, Section 18 of the Act, Section 10, Section 19 of the Act, Section 10, Section 20 of the Act, Section 22 of the Act, Section 10, Section 10, Section 34 of the Act, Section 10 of the Act, Section 35 of the Act, Section 10, Section 45 of the Act, Section 52 of the Act, Section 10, Section 55 of the Act, Section 57 of the Act, Section 10, Section 5 of the Amendment Act.6, Section 16, Section 11, Section 16 of the Amendment Act.7, Section 56, Section 57, the Divorce Act, Section 16, Section 55, Section 19, the Family Courts Act, Section 16, Section 16, Section 8, Section 16, the Amending Act 51 of 2001, Section 10-A of the Act, Section 10-A, the Amending Act 51 of 2001, Section 8, Section 10-A, Section 16, Section 57, Section 16 of the Act, the Amending Act 51 of 2001, the Divorce Act, the Divorce Act, Section 16, Section 16 of the Act, Section 16, Section 17, Section 16

CARDINAL: 1, 8-3-1999, 117, 3, one, one, 15, one, 6, more than one, more than one, 3, 2001.5, 2., 20, 3, three, 4., 17, 23, 32, 19, 23.--The, 24, One, 3, three, three, 280, One, 3, 17-12-2002, 17-12-2002

ORG: Family Court, the Trial Court, Court, Court, Transmed Overseas Inc., Nazarat, Nazarat, the Trial Court, Learned Counsel, Court, Trial Court, Learned Counsel, the Trial Court, Court, Nazarat, Nazarat, Court, Court, A.M. Farooq, Court, Court, the High Court, Parliament, under.-'The Law Commission of India, inter alia, Parliament, Commission, High Courts, the Central Government, the High Court, the Central Government, Parliament, Sections 10,, Commission, the Central Government, inter alia, Christian Personal Law, the High Court, the District Court, the High Court, the District Court, the High Court, the District Court, District Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Law Commission of India, 164th Report, King's Proctor, the High Court', Court, the High Court, the High Court', Court, the Commission on Review of Administrative Laws', the District Court, High Court, the District Court, District Court', the District Court, the High Court, the District Court, Bench, the High Court, the District Court, the Supreme Court, the District Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Bench, the High Court, the High Court, the District Court, the High Court, Learned Counsel, the High Court, the High Court, Learned Counsel, the High Court, High Court, the District Court, Learned Counsel, the District Court, the High Court, Counsel, the Kerala High Court, AIR 2002 Ker, the High Court, the High Court, the District Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Single Bench, the High Court, the Appellate Court, Court, the District Court, the High Court, the High Court, the District Court, Learned Counsel, the High Court, Parliament, the District Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court

PERSON: Bangalore, Bangalore, Bangalore, Bangalore, Vincent Nazarat, Sri Rajanna, D.V. Shylendra Kumar, Sri N. Rajanna, Sebastian, Bill, Bill, Bill, Rajanna, Thomas v Johny, Sri Rajanna, Sebastian, Sri Rajanna, Sebastian

GPE: M.C., Dubai, Dubai, India, Frazer Town, Dubai, Dubai, Dubai, Dubai, Dubai, Counsel, Counsel, India, India, Kerala, Counsel, Counsel, jurisdiction.10, respondent.13

DATE: 1998, the days, 6th January, 2003, 17th December, 2002, 1869, the very same day, 6 months, 1869, the 3rd day of October, 2001, 2001, November 1998, 1869, the 28th April, 2000, 17, 1869, 1869, the 8th May, 1998, 1869, two years, 27, the period of 6 months, 6 months, the period of 6 months, 6 months, 6 months, 6 months, 6 months, six months, the lapse of six months, six months, 17th December, 2002, 6 months, 6 months, 6 months

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, first, first, first, second, first, first, first, first, second, first, second, first, second, second, first, first, first, first, first, first

NORP: Christian, Christians, Christian, Christian, Christian, British, Indian, Indian, British

FAC: Windsor Manor Hotel, Frazer Town, Hotel Guest Line, Sections 17 and 20 of the Act, Sections 16, Sections 10 and 17

TIME: the very first night, late hours, 3.30 a.m.

WORK_OF_ART: 'The Divorce Act, Churches

PRODUCT: Sections 17 and 20

LOC: the District Judge