Commissioner of Customs Vs. Agrotech Foods Ltd.

Decided On : Aug-27-2009

Court : Karnataka

LAW: the Customs Act?(iv, Section 27, the Customs Act, Section 18, the Customs Act, Section 27(2, the Customs Act, Section 15(1)(b, the Customs Act, Section 27(2, the Customs Act, Section 28(c, Section 27, Section 27 of the Act, Section 28C, Section 25, Section 18, Section 18, Section 27, Section 18, Section 27, the Customs Act, Section 18, the Customs Act, Section 18, Section 27, the Customs Act, Section 27, Section 18, the Customs Act, Section 27, Section 18.22, Section 18, the Customs Act, Section 18, Section 18, Section 18, Section 27, Section 27

PERSON: J.1, Palmolein, Trichirapalli v. Hajee A.M., Abdul Rahiman, Sri, T.M. Venkata Reddy, Sri, Rajesh Chander Kumar, Sri, T.M. Venkata Reddy, Sri, Rajesh Chander Kumar, F.216/2001, Show, Palmolein, Trichirapalli v. Hajee A.M., Abdul Rahiman, Sri T.M. Venkatareddy, Sri Rajeshchandra Kumar, Sri T.M. Venkatareddy, Sri Rajeshchandra Kumar, Sri Rajeshchandra Kumar, Sri Rajeshchandra Kumar

ORG: CESTAT, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandal Ltd., C.Ex, SC, Tribunal, Konkan Storage & Systems Pvt. Ltd., Karwar, MT, RBD, MT, Customs, Customs, MT, RBD palmolien, MT, MT, RBD Palmolien, Customs, The Adjudicating Authority, the Consumer Welfare Fund, the Appellate Authority Commissioner of Customs, the Adjudicating Authority, CESTAT, Tribunal, CCE, ELT, Customer, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandal Ltd., C.Ex. & Cus, MT, the Appellate Authority, Customs, MT, RBD, MT, RBD, Customs, the Adjudicating Authority, Customs, RBD Palmolein, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Adjudicating Authority, Tribunal, the Adjudicating Authority, the Adjudicating Authority, Customs, Appellate Authority, the Adjudicating Authority, Tribunal, Tribunal, Customs, Appellate Authority, CCE, Customs, the Adjudicating Authority, the Adjudicating Authority, Tribunal, the Adjudicating Authority, the First Appellate Authority, the Adjudicating Authority, The Adjudicating Authority, the Consumer Welfare Fund, the Supreme Court, Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandal Ltd., Central Excise & Customs, ELT, the Supreme Court, Allied Photographics India Ltd., Allied Photographies India Ltd.', the Supreme Court, Allied Photographs India Ltd.'s, the Supreme Court, Allied Photographies India Ltd.'s, the Original Authority, Original

CARDINAL: 11, 31, 181, 328, 1962?3, 2984.420, 185/2001, 4, 27, 500, 27, 97.510, up to, 402.490, 52/2001, 11,55,156/-, 402.490, 14, 16-2-2002, 213/2005, 11, 2001(133, 23, 2005(181, 328, 500, 402.490, 372, 500, 402.490, 89, 108, 114, 117, 131, 132, 17, one, 2, 1, 500, 14, 16-10-2002, 2, 11-2-2005, 11, 14, 16-10-, 1, 4, 5, 5, 1962?If, 48, 181, 328, 5, 166, 3, 2

PRODUCT: Respondent

DATE: 2005, 10-8-2001, 16-8-2001, 10-8-2001, the same day i.e., 1/2002, 27-9-2001, 27-9-2001, 1962, plus duty.10, the expiry of, six months, 1991, one year or, six months, one year or, six months, one year or, six months, one year or, six months, 2002, one year or, six months, one year or, six months, one year or, six months, 2005, 2004

FAC: Karwar Port

MONEY: 372 US dollars, 372 US dollars, 372US dollars, 307 US dollars, 307 US dollars, 372 US Dollars

TIME: 9-10-2001, 9-10-2001, 9-10-2001, every hour

NORP: Custom, assessment.26

GPE: S.C., Annexure-'B, Assessee, Counsel, Mumbai, Counsel, Counsel

ORDINAL: second, first, first, first

WORK_OF_ART: 27.8.2009