Shree Devkrupa Ship Breaking Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Decided On : Mar-22-2005

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

LAW: Article 226-and, Article 32, Article 226, Section 11B, Section 27, the Customs Act, Article 265 of the Constitution of India, Section 27, the Customs Act, Section 72, the Contract Act, Proposition (ii, the Customs Act, Article 265 of the Constitution of India, Section 72, the Contract Act, Section 17, the Limitation Act, the Customs Act, Proposition (ii, Section 72, the Contract Act, Section 17(1)(c, the Limitation Act, Article 265, Constitution, Section 72, the Contract Act, Section 27, Article 226 of the Constitution or of this Court, Article 32, Article 226, Article 226, Section 11B, section 11B, Section 11B, Section 27, the Customs Act

CARDINAL: 1, 99, 89, 247, 99, 1, one, three, 39, 3, 3, 61, 4, 389, 67, 3, 4, 326, 3, 2

ORG: Mafatlal Inds v Union of India, the Central Excises, Central Excise Tariff Act, Customs Tariff Act, the High Courts, Court, Central Excises, the Central Excises, the Central Excises, Tribunal, Court, the High Court, Supreme Court, CJ, the Central Excises, State, State, Court, State, the Court/Tribunal, Central Excises, Customs, State, State, Court, Sales Tax Officer, Kanhaiyalal Mukundlal Saraf, Court, State, Authority/Tribunal or Court, Authority, Tribunal or Court, the Central Excises, the Central Excises, the Central Excises, the High Courts, Court, the High Court, the Court/Tribunal/Authority, Union of India v. Jain Spinners, SC, Union of India, SC, the Appellate Authorities, State

DATE: 1997, Para 99, 1991, 1944, 1985, 1962, 1991, 1963, 1963, Articles 38, 1959, 1350, 1991, 1962, 1992, 1992, I.T.C. 1993, 1993, 1991, September 19,1991, 1991, 1962

EVENT: Customs Act

PERSON: ali

GPE: Hidayatullah, Tilokchand Motichand, Kanhaiyalal

ORDINAL: third