Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Parappa Vs. Nandarayappa and Others

Decided On : Nov-05-1997

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 17(2, Section 20 of the Act, Section 16(1)(a, Section 17, Section 20 of the Act, Munsiff 3, Section 20 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 17 of the Act, Section 16 of the Act, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17(2

ORG: Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, Karnataka Writ Proceedings Rules, Another v. Collector of Customs, Calcutta,, SC, ILR, Agricultural Produce Marketing, Court, the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, Nandarayappa, Marketing Committee, Munsiff, Munsiff, Marketing Committee, Court, Munsiff, Munsiff, Agricultural Marketing, Munsiff, the Supreme Court, Authority, the High Court, Learned Counsel, the Writ Proceedings Rules, Court, Court, Nagendrappa v State, HCE 618 of 1990, Court, Court

DATE: 1966, 17, 20, 1977 - Rule 13;Constitution, 1962, 1893;Nagendrappa v. State, 1994(3, 7th July, 1997, 1966, 25-4-1997, 1997, later than five years, later than 5 years, 1977

CARDINAL: 16(1, 21;High, 226, 2361;Nandarayappa, 1, 2, 2., 2, 1, 226, 227, 29

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta

GPE: Karnataka, L.J., India, Karnataka

PERSON: Kar, L.J. 320, Bangalore, Kar, G.C. Bharuka, J.1, Parappa, Jamkhandi, Jamkhandi, suo motu, suo motu

LOC: Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single

ORDINAL: first, third, first, third, first, first, first, third, first, first, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //