Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Parappa Vs. Nandarayappa and Others
Decided On : Nov-05-1997
Court : Karnataka
LAW: Section 17(2, Section 20 of the Act, Section 16(1)(a, Section 17, Section 20 of the Act, Munsiff 3, Section 20 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 17 of the Act, Section 16 of the Act, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17(2
ORG: Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, Karnataka Writ Proceedings Rules, Another v. Collector of Customs, Calcutta,, SC, ILR, Agricultural Produce Marketing, Court, the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, Nandarayappa, Marketing Committee, Munsiff, Munsiff, Marketing Committee, Court, Munsiff, Munsiff, Agricultural Marketing, Munsiff, the Supreme Court, Authority, the High Court, Learned Counsel, the Writ Proceedings Rules, Court, Court, Nagendrappa v State, HCE 618 of 1990, Court, Court
DATE: 1966, 17, 20, 1977 - Rule 13;Constitution, 1962, 1893;Nagendrappa v. State, 1994(3, 7th July, 1997, 1966, 25-4-1997, 1997, later than five years, later than 5 years, 1977
CARDINAL: 16(1, 21;High, 226, 2361;Nandarayappa, 1, 2, 2., 2, 1, 226, 227, 29
PRODUCT: Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta
GPE: Karnataka, L.J., India, Karnataka
PERSON: Kar, L.J. 320, Bangalore, Kar, G.C. Bharuka, J.1, Parappa, Jamkhandi, Jamkhandi, suo motu, suo motu
LOC: Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single
ORDINAL: first, third, first, third, first, first, first, third, first, first, second