Ratan Chandra Sharma and anr. Vs. Kum. Sheetal Sharma and ors. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Aug-21-2002

Court: Karnataka

LAW: Article 215, Constitution, Section 20, Section 15 of the Act, Section 15 of the Act, Section 20 of the Act, Section 15, Section 20 of the Act, Article 215, Section 15, Section 15, Section 15, Section 15 of the Act, Section 15, Section 14, Section 15(1)(b, Section 15(1, Section 15 of the Act, Section 15, Section 15, Article 215, Article 215, Section 15(1, Article 215 Constitution, Section 14, Article 215, Section 15(1, Article 215, Article 215, Article 215 of the Constitution of India, Section 2(c, Section 15(1, Section 2(ii)(e, Article 215, Section 15(1, Article 215, Section 15(1, Article 215, Article 215, Constitution, Article 215, Section 10, Section 11, Section 10 of the Act, the Indian Penal Code, Section 10 of the Act, Section 15 of the Act, Section 15, Section 15 of the Act, Section 15 of the Act, Section 15(1)(b, Section 15 of the Act, Section 15, Section 15, Section 15 of the Act, Section 15, Section 15

GPE: Narayan, O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S, O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., Kerala, Kerala, India, R.As, India, India, State, Kerala, Kerala, Kerala, O.S.

NORP: J.1, Ratan

CARDINAL: one, 2., two, 31-3-1990, 29, 29, 4, 3., 31-3-1990, 29, 14, 333, 2, 7206, two, 333, 333, 1 to 4, 4, 2, 4, 7206, 7206, 7206, 5, 2, 4, 1, 7206, 1, 2, 6., One, 8., 1, 333, 9, 10, 10 and 11, four, one, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2001CriLJ4284, 11, 2, 3, 6, 12, 1971CriLJ844, 1972CriLJ643, 15, 12, two, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19, 2, 20, 21, 7206, 22

PERSON: Chandra Sharma, Prithvinath Sharma, Dhanwati Devi Sharma, Civil Station, Bangalore, Dhanwati Devi Sharma, Ram Chandra Sharma, Ramesh Chandra Sharma, Dhanwati Devi Sharma, Schedule, Dhanwati Devi Sharma, Dhanwati Devi Sharma, Dhanwati Devi Sharma, Will, Bangalore, Dhanwati Devi Sharma, Nos, Objection Nos, Erappa v. Channabasappa, Kar, ILR, Kar, M.S. Mani, Law Officer, Law Officer, Counsels, suo motu, Law Officers, Law Officers, Law Officers, Law Officers, Counsel, Erappa, O.P. Gupta, R.L. Kapur v. State, Tamil Nadu, Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmad Ishaque, Erappa, suo motu, Erappa, S.K. Sarkar, Lucknow, suo motu, suo motu, suo motu, take suo motu, Regarding Point Nos

DATE: the year 1981, 1981, 10357, 1981, 1995, 1981, 19224 of 1995, 1981, 10350, 1992, 1998, 1998, 10350, 1992, 10350, 1992, 1998, 10350, 1992, 10034, 1998, 1998, 19224 of 1995, 1971, 1998, 10350, 1992, 1998, 1998, nearly a year back, 1998, 1971, 33 of 1995, 1998, one year, 1971, 1971, 7-7-2000, 1999(6, 76, 28-7-2000, four weeks, 1971, 1971, 1971, 1971, 1971, '12, 1971, 1860, May 17th, 1999, 11th May, 2000, the year 1955, 1971, Section 15(1)(b, '19, 1971, one year, 1998, the year 2001

ORDINAL: second, second, second, second, second, second, first, second, first, second, first, first, first, first, second, first, third

ORG: IV Additional City Civil Judge, Smt, Court, Court, Court, the Trial Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Apex Court, Osborne Road Cross, Court, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, Court, the City Civil Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, Court, the Apex Court, the Trial Court, the Advocate-General, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Learned Counsel, Court, the Civil Court, Court, Advocate-General, the Advocate-General's, Court, Advocate-General, the Civil Court, Advocate-General, the Contempt of Courts Act, the Advocate-General, the Advocate-General, Learned Counsel, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Advocate-General's, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Union Territory of Delhi, the Central Government, a Subordinate Court, the High Court, the -Subordinate Court, the Advocate-General, the Apex Court, the Advocate-General, Integra, ApexCourt, Advocate-General, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, the Apex Court, State, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Advocate-General, Supreme Court, the State/Center, the High Court/Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, C.K. Daphtary, Court, Vijaya Bank Employees', Society Limited v. Muneerappa, High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, the High Court, the Advocate-General, the Advocate-General, the Contempt of Courts Act, the High Court, the Advocate-General, the High Court, Court, Court, the Advocate-General, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Advocate-General, the Advocate-General, the High Court, Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, High Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, High Court, the High Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, the Advocate-General, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Subordinate Courts, SubordinateCourts, Court, Subordinate Court, Court, the Advocate-General, the Advocate-General, Court, The Apex Court, State, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Solicitor-General, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Bench, the Supreme Court, State, Advocate-General, the Advocate-General, the Contempt of Courts Act, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Advocate-General, the Advocate-General's, the Apex Court, Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Vinay Chandra Misra, The Apex Court, the High Court, the High Court, a Subordinate Court, the Subordinate Court, the Advocate-General, the High Court, the Advocate-General, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the High Court, a Subordinate Court, a Subordinate Court, the High Court, the Sanyal Committee, Court, Court, the Advocate-General, The Advocate-General, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, Court, Court, the Scrutiny Branch, the High Court, the Advocate-General

PRODUCT: P.W. 1, Point

FAC: the Official Gazette, the Official Gazette

WORK_OF_ART: Power of High Court, Miscellaneous Appeal No