National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Lachha

Decided On : Feb-24-1992

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 110-A(3, Section 166(3, Section 110-A of the, Section 110, Section 92A, Section 166, Section 165, Section 140, Section 110-A of the, Section 217(4, Section 6(e, the General Clauses Act, Section 110-A of the, Section 110-A of the Act, Section 110(3, Section 217 of the 1988 Act, The Motor Vehicles Act, Section 6, Section 6, Central Act or Regulation, the Repealing Act or Regulation, Section 110-A of the, Section 217 of the 1988 Act, Section 6(e, the General Clauses Act, Section 110-A, Section 110-A of the, Section 110-A of the Act, Section 166, Section 110-A of the Act, Section 166, Section 166(3, the General Clauses Act, the Constitution of the Tribunal, Constitution, Section 110A(3).8, Section 166, Section 110-A of the, Section 110-A of the, Section 110-A of the Act, Section 166(3, Section 110-A of the Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 110, Section 110-A of the Act, Section 110, the Fatal Accidents Act, Section 110-A of the Act, Section 110-A of the Act, the Fatal Accidents Act, the Fatal Accidents Act, Section 217 of the 1988 Act, Section 217, Section 6, Section 6(e, the General Clauses Act, Section 110-A of the Act, Section 6(e, Section 6, Section 6, Section 5, the Factories Act, Section 7 of the Goods Act, Section 6, Section 6, Section 217(4, Section 6(e, Section 110-A of the, Section 110-A, Section 6(e, Section 110-A, Section 166, Section 166(3, Section 110-A, Section 110-A of the, Section 166(3, Section 110-A, Section 110-A, Section 110-A, Section 110-A of the Act, Section 110-D of the, Section 173 of the 1988 Act, Section 173, Section 110-D of the, the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, Section 173 of the Act, Section 173 of the Act, Section 100-D of the M.V. Act, Section 110-D of the, Section 173 of the 1988 Act, Section 217(4, Section 8(e, the General Clauses Act, Section 110-A, Section 110-A of the Act, Section 166, Section 166(3, Section 110-A of the, Section 110-A of the, Section 110-A of the, Section 110-A of the Act, Section 166(3, Section 110-A of the, Section 166(3, Section 110A of 1939 Act, Section 110-A of the, Section 166(3, Section 166, the 1988 Act, Section 68-C of the, Section 100 of the 1988 Act, Section 68-C of the, Section 100 of the 1988 Act, Section 100, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 68C of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 217, Section 68G of the Motor Vehicles Act 1939, Section 100 of this Act, Section 68C, Section 68-C, Section 68A., Section 3 of the Road Transport Corporations Act, Section 68C, Section 99, Section 68C, Section 68A of 1939 Act, Section 217(2)(e, Section 100, Section 100, Section 100, Section 217, Section 100, Section 68C, Section, Section 100(4, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 68C, Section 166, Section 166(3, Section 166(3, Section 166(3, Section 110-A of the, Section 166(3

PERSON: Rama Jois, XXX XXX(e, Sufficient, Clauses Act.10, K.R. MURALIDHAR, xxx(iv, AIR1987SC1324, V.G. Raikar, Raikar, Rule Nisi, V.G. Raikar

DATE: J1, 1988, 1988, 1989, more than six months, 1939, 1988, one year, six months, six months, six months, 6-10-1989, 1988, six months, six months, later than twelve months, six months, six months, 1988, 4 of 1939, 1897, 10 of 1897, 1988, 1988, six months, 1-7-1989, six months, only six months, 6-10-1989, one year, more than six months, 1976]2SCR266, 1966, A period of, two years, March 1967, 1939, 60 days, July 1967, March 1967, about four months, about two months, six months, three weeks, six months, more than a year, one year, six months, 1939, six months, the period six months, 1855, 1855, 1897, 10 of 1897, 1988, 1-7-1989, 1989, 1 -7-1939, one year, any date earlier, 6-1989, 1989, 1989, 1939, 1988, 1989, 1988, 1-7-1989, three months, the period of, six months, six months, one year, one year, one year, one year, 1988, 1-7-1989, 4 of 1939, 1950, today, one year, one year, One year, 1-7-1989, 1990, one year, 1939, one year, today, 1988, 1988, 1989, one year, 4697 of 1992, 1988, more than six months, one year, 2079 of 1989

CARDINAL: two, one, 3-4-1988, 1, 3-4-1988, 1, 3-4-1988, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 166, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 1, 1, 8, 3-4-1988, 3-4-1988, 1991]3SCR912, two, 22, 1, 1, 1, 3, time,9, 4, 3-4-1988, 1, 1, 1988)IILLJ385SC, 29, 1976]2SCR731, 1, 1, 30-6-1989, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 25,000, 1, 1, one, 1, 30-6-1989, 30-6-1989, 1 -7-1989, 3-4-1988, 30-6-1989, 1, 3-4-1989, 3, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, one, one, 4, 2, 4, 4, 1, 1, 1, 1, two, 1986]2SCR735, 4, 1, 1, 1963]2SCR774, 1, 3-4-1988, 1, 472/1992, 297/1992

ORG: Appeals, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, the Insurance Company, the Motor Vehicles 1988 Act, Tribunal, Tribunal, National Insurance Company, Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, Section, Tribunal, or(d, Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, Section, Tribunal, State, State, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, Counsel for the Insurance Company, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, VINOD, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, the Judgment reads:'We, Court, New India Insurance Co. Ltd., the Claims Tribunal under Section 110 of the Motor Vehicles Act, the Civil Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Counsel, the High Court, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, Legislature, Tribunal, Tribunal, Counsel, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, AIR 1987, SC, the Tribunal under Section 110-A of the Act, Counsel, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, A.P.S.E. BOARD v. UNION OF INDIA, Agricultural, Industrial Society Ltd v. Union of India, Tribunal, Tribunal, Counsel, Court, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY, MFA, Court, the Supreme Court, Counsel, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Decision of the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Counsel, Court, SHERIFF, the Judgment reads:'5, State, State Transport, reward;(b, the Central Government, Road Transport Corporation, the Central Government, State, the Central Government, State, State Transport Undertaking under Section 68A(b, Scheme, a State Government, Government, Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, SOMAVANTI, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Supreme, Counsel, Section, Court, Tribunal, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, consideration.18, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal

GPE: Bangalore City, these:(i, the City of Bangalore, Shanti Misra, G.S.R.T. CORPORATION, Amadalavalasa, Counsel, Legislature.12, MOHAMED, Counsel, Bangalore City

EVENT: the 1988 Act, the 1988 Act, the 1988 Act, the 1988 Act, the 1988 Act, the 1988 Act, the 1989 Act, the New Act, the 1988 Act, the 1988 Act

NORP: xxx(4

ORDINAL: second, second, third, secondly, second, second, first

PERCENT: 9%

PRODUCT: Judgment, Section 110, Judgment, a Full Bench Decision, The Full Bench, the Full Bench

TIME: the 1939 Act, 10-1-1968, the 1939 Act, the 1939 Act, the 1939 Act

MONEY: fifty per cent

WORK_OF_ART: Question of Law