Rukmanlyamma Vs. A.M. Venkata Swamy

Decided On : Jan-03-1991

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 92A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 92A of the 1939 Act, Section 140 No Fault Liability, Section 92A of the, Section 140 of the 1988 Act, Section 140, Section 92A of the 1939 Act, Section 140 of 1988 Act, Section 140 of the 1988 Act, Section 92A, Section 110-A of the Act, Section 92A of the 1939 Act, The Motor Vehicles Act, Section 217, Section 140 of the 1988 Act, Section 92A of the 1939 Act, Section 140, Section 140 of the 1988 Act, Section 140 of the Act, Section 92A of the 1939 Act, Section 217 of the 1988 Act, The Motor Vehicles Act, Section 6, Section 217(2, Section 110-A of the, Section 92A of the 1939 Act, Section 140 of the 1988 Act, Section 92A of the 1939 Act, Section 217, Section 217 of the 1988 Act, Section 6, Section 217 of the 1988 Act, Section 6, Section 6(c, Section 6(e, Section 110-A of the, Section 110-A of the, Section 95, Section 92A, Section 140 of the 1988 Act, Section 140 of the 1988 Act, Section 13, Section 13, Section 6, Section 217, Section 92-A, Section 92A, Section 92A of the 1939 Act, Section 140 of the 1988 Act, Section 92A, Section 92A of the Act, Section 92A of, Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act

PERSON: Rama Jois, Rs, XXX XXX XXX(4, SHANTABAI S. DHUME., Sri S.P. Shankar, Sri C.K. Kambeyanda

CARDINAL: three, 25,000/-as, 9-6-1989, 1, 25,000/-, 19-6-1990, 15,000/-, 25,000/-, 25,000/-, 31, 15,000/-, 25,000/-, 92A., 1, 1, fifteen thousand, 1, 1, three, 1, 1, twenty-five thousand, twelve thousand, 1, 1, 25,000/-, 716, 1, 15,000/-, 1, 1, 4, 4, 1982]3SCR244, 20,000/-according, 20,000/-, 50,000/-The, 20,000/-, 20,000/-, 2-3-1970, 25,000/-, 1, 716, 1985]2SCR202, two, 1-10-1982, 25,000/-, 2, 25,000/-

ORG: the No Fault Liability, Tribunal, orders?2, No Fault Liability, Tribunal, No Fault Liability, No Fault Liability, Tribunal, Fault Liability, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, Tribunal, LIABILITY, the 'No Fault Liability', No Fault Liability, Tribunal, Counsel, the Section reads:'217, State, State, Central Actor Regulation, or(d, Counsel for the Insurance Company, Counsel, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, the Insurance Company, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Insurance Company, The Supreme Court, the Insurance Company, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Fault Liability, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, GUIN v. NIRANJAN MODAK, Court, Court, The Supreme Court, Court, an Appellate Court, the Supreme Court, the Rent Control Act, the Appellate Court, Legislative, the Appellate Court, the Supreme Court, the No Fault Liability, Legislature, the Judgment of the Bombay High Court, ORIENTAL FIRE & GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD, SMT, AIR, the Bombay High Court, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, Lakshmi Narayan Guin, the Supreme Court, Lakshmi Narayan Guin, the Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court, the No Fault Liability, Parliament, No Fault Liability, Tribunal, Standing Counsel, Tribunal

DATE: Section 92A of the, 1988, 1-7-1989, 25-5-1989, 1939, 1989, 1988, 1988, 1-7-1989, 23-9-1988, 28-8-1989, seven thousand five hundred, 1988, 1990, 4 of 1939, 1897, 10 of 1897, 1988, June 30, 1969, June 30, 1969 to June 29, 1970, March 2, 1970, April 5, 30th June, 1969, the period ending 29th June 1970, 2nd March 1970, 1970, 1-7-1989, 1990, 1990, 1988, 1987, 1939, 1988, 1-7-1989 i.e., the 2nd, 2 weeks

QUANTITY: 3-2-1989

ORDINAL: first, third, 5th, first

GPE: Padma, Padma

EVENT: Bombay 52

WORK_OF_ART: Vakalath for the Insurance Company