Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Universal Transformers Vs. the Asst. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and ors.
Decided On : Feb-28-1997
Court : Karnataka
LAW: Section 5(3)(a, Section 6-B of the Act, Section 5(3)(a, Section 6-B of the Act, Section 5(3)(a, Section 6-B of the Act, Section 5(3)(a, Section 6B of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Central Act 43 of, Section 5-A, Section 5(3)(a, Section 6-B of the Act, Section 6-B of the Act, Section 5(3)(a, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5(3)(a, Section 2(t, Section 5 of the Act, Section 6-B of the Act, Section 5(3)(a, Section 5(3)(a, Section 5(3)(a, Section 5(3)(a, Section 5(3)(a, Section 5(3)(a, Section 6B
ORG: Dattu, Writ Petitions, Karnataka Sales Tax Act, Electrical Goods, M/s. Kirloskar Company, Learned Counsel, the Learned Counsel, the Learned Counsel, Supreme Court, Court, B.P. AUTOMOBILES 55, STC, the Learned Counsel, Sales Tax, State, the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, Proviso, dealer;c, Trade mark holder;d, Clauses, State, Clauses, Court, The Supreme Court, Court, Legislature, Supreme Court, Learned Counsel
NORP: J.1
DATE: 1957, 1989-90, 1992-93, the assessment years, years, 192/87-88, years 1989-90, 1992-93 and, 1993-94, '10, 1958, '12
PERSON: Bangalore, Sri S. Narayan, Manufacturer, A.V. FERNANDEZ v. STATE, KERALA, Sri Shivayogi Swamy, materials;e, A.V. Fernandez, A.V. Fernandez's
ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, First, first, first, first
PRODUCT: Act.4
GPE: Act.5
CARDINAL: 5.6.1987, 8, 561, 79.8, 11, less than 10, 20