Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Universal Transformers Vs. the Asst. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and ors.

Decided On : Feb-28-1997

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 5(3)(a, Section 6-B of the Act, Section 5(3)(a, Section 6-B of the Act, Section 5(3)(a, Section 6-B of the Act, Section 5(3)(a, Section 6B of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Central Act 43 of, Section 5-A, Section 5(3)(a, Section 6-B of the Act, Section 6-B of the Act, Section 5(3)(a, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5(3)(a, Section 2(t, Section 5 of the Act, Section 6-B of the Act, Section 5(3)(a, Section 5(3)(a, Section 5(3)(a, Section 5(3)(a, Section 5(3)(a, Section 5(3)(a, Section 6B

ORG: Dattu, Writ Petitions, Karnataka Sales Tax Act, Electrical Goods, M/s. Kirloskar Company, Learned Counsel, the Learned Counsel, the Learned Counsel, Supreme Court, Court, B.P. AUTOMOBILES 55, STC, the Learned Counsel, Sales Tax, State, the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, Proviso, dealer;c, Trade mark holder;d, Clauses, State, Clauses, Court, The Supreme Court, Court, Legislature, Supreme Court, Learned Counsel

NORP: J.1

DATE: 1957, 1989-90, 1992-93, the assessment years, years, 192/87-88, years 1989-90, 1992-93 and, 1993-94, '10, 1958, '12

PERSON: Bangalore, Sri S. Narayan, Manufacturer, A.V. FERNANDEZ v. STATE, KERALA, Sri Shivayogi Swamy, materials;e, A.V. Fernandez, A.V. Fernandez's

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, First, first, first, first

PRODUCT: Act.4

GPE: Act.5

CARDINAL: 5.6.1987, 8, 561, 79.8, 11, less than 10, 20

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //