Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Manjunath Kashi Kumtakar Vs. Jainabi Kom Sayyed Idrus Khazi

Decided On : Feb-10-1995

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 65, Agricultural Lands Act, Section 80 C.P.C., Section 80, the Land Reforms Act, Section 80, Section 84, Section 65, Section 65, Section 80, Section 142 of the Act, Section 65, Section 61, Rule 35, Section 84, Section 85, Section 84, Section 65, Section 65, Section 85, Section 84, Section 65, Section 65, Section 65, Section 142 of the Act, Section 61, Section 61, Section 61, Section 61, Section 65(2, Section 66, Section 66, Section 65, Sections 44, Section 44, Section 61, Section 132, Section 61, Section 142, the Land Reforms Act, the Land Reforms Act, Section 142 of the Land Reforms Act, Section 85, Section 132, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80

ORG: Venkataraman, Syed Idrus, the Bombay Tenancy, BT & AL Act', Tahsildar, the Revenue Appellate Tribunal, the Tribunal on the ground of jurisdiction, Appeal, The State Government, the Civil Court, the BT & AL Act, Court, BT & AL Act, Court, CPC, Court, Court, Substantial Questions of Law:'1, B.T. & A.L. Act, the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, B.T. & A.L Act, Government, Court, CPC, Karnataka Land Reforms Act, BT & AL Act, the BT & AL Act, the BT & AL Act, BT & AL Act, the State Government, the State Government, AL Rules, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, BT, AL Act, Sections 84 and 85 of the Act, the BT & AL Act and Rules, the State Government, Government, the BT & AL Act and Rules, BT & AL Act, the Decision of this Court, the Supreme Court, HANUMANTHA DURGA, State, the BT & AL Act, LAL SHANKAR LAL, the BT & AL Act, the Civil Court, hereunder:'The State Government, the BT & AL Act, the BT & AL Act, the State Government, BOMBAY, Bombay Law Reporter, the Bombay High Court, the BT & AL Act, the State Government, Chapter IV, The Bombay High Court, Chapter IV, the State Government, Government, a Civil Court, the BT & AL Act, the Land Reforms Act, the BT & AL Act, BT & AL Act, the BT & AL Act, the Civil Court, CPC, CPC, CPC, Government, Court, CPC, Court, Government, Court, CPC, CPC

DATE: J1, a period of, 10 years, 5 years, 5 years, 10 years, 1966-67, a period of, 10 years, 1966-67, 10 years, 1961, under Section 84, 10 years from, 1966-67, 2 consecutive years, 31st day of March, the year, 5 years, the expiry of 10 years, 2 consecutive years, one year, one year, 5 years.11, a period of, 10 years, 5 years, one year, 10 years, 10 more years, 10 years, 1988, 1966, 1966, 1958, 45

ORDINAL: second, second, second, second, second, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, third, second, second

PERSON: Kumta, Karwar, Ali Khazi, Kumta Taluk, Tahsildar, Kumta, Collector, KLJ Supp, Gazette

GPE: R.A.94/73, Haritha village, BT

CARDINAL: One, 21, 26.3.1951, 7.4.1951, 31.3.1961, 31.3.1961, 31.12.66, 31.12.66, 2, 35, 3, less than, 31.12.76, 3, 294, 2, 1991]1SCR81, 45

FAC: Tahsildar, Sections 44

PRODUCT: Mamalatdar

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //