Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Smt. Jayamma Vs. the Commissioner of Excise in Karnataka and ors.
Decided On : Jun-09-2003
Court : Karnataka
LAW: Section 29(b, Section 29, Section 45 of the Act, Section 29, Section 29, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 29(b, Section 29(b, Section 29, Section 29(b, Article 226 of the Constitution of India
PERSON: Patil, J.1, Hassan Range, Hassan, Pleader, Counsels, Pleader, Pleader
ORDINAL: 3rd, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd, 3rd
CARDINAL: 14-6-2002, 27, 662, 31, 21, 10,800, 6-5-2002, 14, 27, 662, 1, 3, 1, 2, 3, three, 31, 21, 10,800, 50, 12, 20, one
DATE: 2001-02, 7-9-2002, 2002, 20-12-2002, 2002, the excise year 2001-2002, 24-5-2002, 2002, 7-9-2002, 2002, four weeks, today
PRODUCT: Annexure-F
ORG: CL-2, FIR, the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, The Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, the Competent Court, inter alia, Court, the Competent Authority, The Competent Authority, the State Government, CL-2, The Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, the Competent Authorities, Court, the Apex Court, the High Court, dismissed.8
GPE: Karenahally Village, Hassan District, Counsels
QUANTITY: 180 ml, 180 ml
PERCENT: 4-4-2002