Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Smt. Jayamma Vs. the Commissioner of Excise in Karnataka and ors.

Decided On : Jun-09-2003

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 29(b, Section 29, Section 45 of the Act, Section 29, Section 29, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 29(b, Section 29(b, Section 29, Section 29(b, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

PERSON: Patil, J.1, Hassan Range, Hassan, Pleader, Counsels, Pleader, Pleader

ORDINAL: 3rd, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd, 3rd

CARDINAL: 14-6-2002, 27, 662, 31, 21, 10,800, 6-5-2002, 14, 27, 662, 1, 3, 1, 2, 3, three, 31, 21, 10,800, 50, 12, 20, one

DATE: 2001-02, 7-9-2002, 2002, 20-12-2002, 2002, the excise year 2001-2002, 24-5-2002, 2002, 7-9-2002, 2002, four weeks, today

PRODUCT: Annexure-F

ORG: CL-2, FIR, the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, The Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, the Competent Court, inter alia, Court, the Competent Authority, The Competent Authority, the State Government, CL-2, The Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, the Competent Authorities, Court, the Apex Court, the High Court, dismissed.8

GPE: Karenahally Village, Hassan District, Counsels

QUANTITY: 180 ml, 180 ml

PERCENT: 4-4-2002

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //