Semantic Analysis by spaCy
M.M. Malleshaiah Vs. K. Gururaj and anr.
Decided On : Feb-27-2004
Court : Karnataka
LAW: Section 397, Section 156(3, Third Amendment Act, the BDA Act to Section 38(c, Section 38(c, the Principal Act
PERSON: Ramanna, J.1, Bangalore, B.K. Padmavathamma, B.N. Sathyanarayana Rao v. State, Ishwar Rao, Padmavathamma, B.N. Sathyanarayana Rao, Bangalore
CARDINAL: 30-2-2001, 128, 1, 11-10-1985, 11-10-1985, 466, 468, 469, 128, 487, 28, 129, 5, 8-12
ORG: the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, the Trial Court, BDA, the Civil Court, Sections, IPC, the Trial Court, The Trial Court, the Trial Court, BDA, Counsels, PCR No, the Civil Court, BDA, BDA, BDA, the Trial Court, Court, Court, BDA, the XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Court, Court, BDA, BDA, Court, Legislature, BDA, BDA, BDA, BDA, BDA, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, BDA, Court
DATE: 1997, 27-9-1985, 27-9-1985, 467, 20-8-1987, 1987, that day, 1985, 10153, 1985, 10153, 1985, three months, 1991, 1985, 1989, 19177 of 1992, 1993
GPE: P.C., Smt, Karnataka, O.S., O.S., O.S., incorrect.10
NORP: Rules
ORDINAL: third