Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M.M. Malleshaiah Vs. K. Gururaj and anr.

Decided On : Feb-27-2004

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 397, Section 156(3, Third Amendment Act, the BDA Act to Section 38(c, Section 38(c, the Principal Act

PERSON: Ramanna, J.1, Bangalore, B.K. Padmavathamma, B.N. Sathyanarayana Rao v. State, Ishwar Rao, Padmavathamma, B.N. Sathyanarayana Rao, Bangalore

CARDINAL: 30-2-2001, 128, 1, 11-10-1985, 11-10-1985, 466, 468, 469, 128, 487, 28, 129, 5, 8-12

ORG: the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, the Trial Court, BDA, the Civil Court, Sections, IPC, the Trial Court, The Trial Court, the Trial Court, BDA, Counsels, PCR No, the Civil Court, BDA, BDA, BDA, the Trial Court, Court, Court, BDA, the XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Court, Court, BDA, BDA, Court, Legislature, BDA, BDA, BDA, BDA, BDA, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, BDA, Court

DATE: 1997, 27-9-1985, 27-9-1985, 467, 20-8-1987, 1987, that day, 1985, 10153, 1985, 10153, 1985, three months, 1991, 1985, 1989, 19177 of 1992, 1993

GPE: P.C., Smt, Karnataka, O.S., O.S., O.S., incorrect.10

NORP: Rules

ORDINAL: third

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //