Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Nagappa Hanumanthappa Lamani Vs. Management of Sericulture Department, Hirekerur

Decided On : Jun-26-2002

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 25-F, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25-F of the Act, Section 2(s, Section 2(oo, Section 25-F, Section 2(s, Section 25-F, Section 2(s, the Air Force Act, the Army Act, the Navy Act, Section 2(oo, Section 25-F, Section 2(s, Section 2(s, Section 2(oo, Section 25-F of the Act', Section 25, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2(oo, The Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2(s, Section 2(oo, Section 25-F, Section 10 of the Act, Section 10(4-A, the Karnataka Amendment Act, Section 15, Section 25-F of the Act, Section 2(oo, Section 25-F, Section 2(oo

ORG: ORDERH., the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Labour Court, Government Advocate, Court, State, Karnataka Casual, Daily Rated Workers' Union, Hubli, Labour Court, Labour Court, the Supreme Court, the Labour Court, Sections 25-F(b, the Supreme Court, State Bank of Patiala, Sections 25-F, Labour Court, the Labour Court, Urban Bank Limited, Labour Court, Madurai, the Srirangam Bank, Labour Court, the Appointing Authority, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Division Bench, Bench, the Supreme Court, Punjab Land Development and Reclamation Corporation Limited, Labour Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court of Allahabad, the Supreme Court, Court, Haryana Urban Development Authority, the Labour Court, the Supreme Court.16, the Labour Court, Uttar Pradesh, the High Court of Allahabad, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Court, The Labour Court, Court, Karnataka Casual and, Daily Rated Workers' Union, the Government Advocate, the Labour Court, Sections 14, Haryana High Court, Labour Court, Sections 14, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Labour Court, The Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court

NORP: J.1, Punjab

PERSON: Hubli, Madhyamik Siksha Parishad, Uttar Pradesh v., Anil Ku-mar Mishra, Sri Naik, Counsel, Madhyamik Siksha Parishad's, Kar, ILR, Kar, Madhyamik Siksha Parishad's, supra?7, Workman, Srirangam Co-operative, Anr, K.A. Swami, Vikramaditya Pandey, Madhyamik Siksha Parishad's, Madhyamik Siksha Parishad's, Madhyamik Siksha

DATE: daily, 8-11-1987, 1990, more than 240 days, daily, daily, 240 days, more than 240 days, 1178, more than 240 days, 1950, 45 of 1950, 1950, 46 of 1950, 1957, 62 of 1957, or(iii, one month's, more than 240 days, 240 days, the day, daily, 240 days, 1996, daily, more than 240 days, daily, 240 days, daily, 240 days, 240 days, 1947, 240 days', 1947, 240 days', more than 240 days, 240 days, more than 240 days, the day, 1994, daily, 240 days, 240 days

CARDINAL: 31, 2002(3, 8, 25, 25, 25, 25, one, 1990)IILLJ70SC, 11, two, 2001)ILLJ701SC, 2002)IILLJ265SC, 4, 15, 15, two

GPE: service.4, Karnataka, L.J., Santosh Gupta v., the Industrial Disputes Act.12, K.K.

WORK_OF_ART: Chandigarh and Ors, Chandigarh and Ors, Chandigarh and Ors

PRODUCT: Act.21

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //