British Physical Laboratories India Ltd. Vs. B.M. Shama Rao

Decided On : Nov-24-1992

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 31, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 31, Section 31 of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution.ii, Section 31, Article 14 of the Constitution.(iii, Section 31, Section 31 of the Act, Section 31 of the Act, Section 31 of the Act, Section 31 of the Act, Section 21, Section 31, Section 31, Section 21 of the Act, Section 31 of the Act, Section 21, Section 13 of the West Bengal, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21(1, Section 21(1, Section 21(1)(h, Section 31, Section 21(1)(h, Section 21(1)(h, Article 14 of the Constitution.12, the Expenditure Tax Act, Section 21(1)(h, Section 21(1)(h, Article 14, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21(1)(h, Section 21, Section 31 of the Act, Article 14, Section 21, the Tamilnadu Act, Section 21(1)(h

PERSON: Shivashankar Bhat, H. PADMANABHA RAO v., ILR1986KAR2480, ARYA v. STATE, Padmanabha Rao's, Padmanabha Rao's, H. SHIVA RAO, H.R. Venkataramanaiah, Counsel, Lakshminarayan Guin's, Shiva Rao's, Venkataramanaiah, Padmanabha Rao's, Sri H.R.

NORP: J.1, Mandamus

DATE: monthly, 1961, 1st September 1977, 1838 of 1980, 4th March 1986, 19th June 1986.3, 1st July 1986, 1961, 1961, between 1961 and 1986, the year 1961, 1986, 1986, 1960, the year 1961, between 1961 and 1986, monthly, 500A, the year 1986, the year 1961.5, 1st July 1986, the year 1977, 1st July 1986, 30th June 1986, 1985]2SCR202, Section 13(1, 400/- per day, 400/- per day, annual, annual, annual, 8, question.15, monthly, 1st July 1986, 1st July 1986, 1314, '17, 1960, 400/- per month, monthly, 1446, monthly, 5,000/- per month, 5,000/- per month, 5000/- per month, 1973, 400/- per month, 1973, today, these days of universal day, 1973, today, 1986, 1992

CARDINAL: 2,150/-, 500/-, 500/-, 150/-, 2069, two, 40,000/-, more than one, 1991ECR657(SC, one, 1, 1974]3SCR760, 1)(h, two, four hundred, one, four hundred, 50/-, 500/-, 50/-, 500/-, 500/-, 500/-, more than four hundred, 4, 1448, 400/-, at least five, 400/-, 381

ORG: the Karnataka Rent Control Act, Civil Suit, Suit, the City Civil Courts, Suit, O.S.No, Court, State, KARNATAKA, Rattan Arya's, ILR, KAR 2069, the Karnataka Rent Control Act, State, Court, the Decision of the Supreme Court, RATTAN, ILR, KAR, Lease & Rent Control, Supreme, Court, Court, Appeal, ANR, MUNISWAMI, Court, the Appellate Court, Court, Court, the Decision of the Supreme Court, ANR, Court, Learned Counsel, Suit, Court, the two Decisions of the Supreme Court, Lakshmi Narayana Guin's, the Civil Court, the Supreme Court, the West Bengal, the Rent Control Act, the Supreme Court, Civil, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, FEDERATION OF HOTEL & RESTAURANT v., the Supreme Court, Hotels and Restaurants, Hotel, The Supreme Court, the State Legislature, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, ANR, UNION OF INDIA, ANR, the Supreme Court, Legislature, Court, Society, Court, Act, Legislature, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, thus:'A, The Supreme Court, Court, State, Court, Legislature, Legislature, Court, Court, Court, Society, Legislature, Society, Legislature, Ratan Arya's, Tamilnadu Buildings (, Lease & Rent Control, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Rattan Arya's, the Supreme Court Decision, State, Legislature, Government Advocate, State, the Central Government, Suit, Court

GPE: Bangalore City, case.10, Counsel, Jammu

FAC: the Tamil Nadu Buildings

LOC: Jammu, Kashmir

EVENT: the Preamble of the Act

ORDINAL: second, first, first