Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bandi Ramappa S/O Late Bheemappa Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by Its Chief Secretary and ors.

Decided On : Apr-17-2008

Court : Karnataka

LAW: the Excise Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution and, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 14, Section 5, the Indian Contract Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, the Contract Act, Sections 5, the Contract Act, the Notification Annexure-A, the Contract Act, Clauses 20 to 22, Article 299(1, Section 5, the Indian Contract Act, Section 5, the Contract Act, Rule 12-A, Rule 12-A of the said Rules, Contract Act

CARDINAL: 1, 15.6.2005, 1.7.2005, 26.5.2005, 1,95,00,000/-, 18(a, 1.7.2005, 27.6.2005, 8920/06, 8920/06, 6, 1.7.2005, 1.84, 1.7.2005, 1, 3, 2, 4, 1, 8920/06, 118, 213, One, 229, 1, 1.84, 6, two, 28.2.1975, 1.3.1975, 15.3.1975.It, 2, 6, 2, 12, Ex.1, at least first, 2, 2, 50, 28.11.1997, 50, 1977]1SCR811, 2007(2, 290, 2007(2, 290, 1.6.1994, 9.5.1994, 16.5.1994, 11.5.1994, 21.5.1994, 18.5.1994, 21.5.1994, 23.5.1994, 6 and 7, 11.5.1994, 21.5.1994, 16.5.1994, 16.5.1994, 18.5.1994, 20.5.1994, 21.5.1994, 18.5.1994, 20.5.1994, One, 21, 1970]2SCR594, 3, 26.05.2005, 13, 2076 to 2081, 20.1.1983, 23, 1980]2SCR724, 3, 1.4.1983, 1969]1SCR351, 2002(80)ECC255, three, 7, 1978]2SCR621, 26.05.2005, as additional one, 1.84, 2, 2 to 6, 1.7.2005, 3, 1.84, 1.7.2005, 4, 9.2.2008, 1.7.2005, 1.84, 24.10.05, 1.84, 2 to 5

LOC: Single, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single Judge, Octroi, Single

ORG: Court, W.P., The Government of Karnataka, the Earnest Money Deposit, EMD, EMD, EMD, EMD, EMD, EMD, EMD, EMD, the Government of Karnataka Finance Department, EMD, Court, Court, the Government (Finance Department, KMD, W.P., AGA, the Government, Finance Department, EMD, the Government of Karnataka, Finance Department, Dakshina Kannada District, the Hon'ble Apex Court, ABL International Ltd., Anr, Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd., State, Corporation of Kazakhstan, the State Corporation, the Reserve Bank of India, Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India, State Corporation, Corporation, Bench, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Registrar of Trade Marks, the High Court, State, Hon'ble Supreme Court, EMD, EMU, High Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, National Highways Authority of India, the State Government, the Retail Sale of Country Liquor, the High Court, the Excise Authorities, the State Budget, State, the Excise Authorities, the Excise Department, Department, the Excise Department, the High Court, UMD, the High Court, National Highways Authority of India, guarantee.10, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, AGA, Lakhanlal, The State of Orissa, AGA, Schedule-C, the State Government, Retail Vend of Arrack, High Court of, Madhya Pradesh and Ors, High Court, Vinod J. Agarwal, the High Court of, Madhya Pradesh, Court, the Supreme Court, Government, Loksatta, Bombay High Court, Union of India, the Supreme Court, Appellant, AGA, Schedule-C, Court, the Division Bench, the Supreme Court, State of Uttar Pradesh, Court, the Karnataka Excise, AGA, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Suffice, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Authority, the Apex Court, xerox, Suffice, AGA, AGA, EMD, EMD, Schedule-C, EMD, W.P., EMD, Annexure-K, Government, Finance Department, EMD

PERSON: Retail, Mangalore, Mangalore, Mangalore, Sri V. Lakshinarayana, Sri Gangadhar Sangolli, Addl, Dakshina Kannada, Nos, Nos, Sri V. Lakshminarayan, Sri V. Lakshminarayana, Anr, Law, Addl, Ganga Enterprises, Anr, Parekh, Parekh, Parekh, Parekh, Parekh, Rajasthan, Therefore, Sri V. Lakshminarayan, Mira Bhayander Municipal Council, Nos, Bhimsen Walaiti Ram, Sri V. Lakshminarayan, Arrack, Retail, Arrack, Sri V. Lakshminarayana, Kishori Lal Minocha, Maneka Gandhi v. Union, Retail, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore, Nos

DATE: the excise year 2005-07, monthly, the previous year, the same day, 26.5.2005, 5.7.2005, monthly, the previous year, 11067/2007, the excise year 2006-07, 2004, 25.6.2005, monthly, the previous year, 1872, 30th March, 1972, 12.2.1975, 5 days, 1st March, 1975, 31.7.1997, 20.11.1997, all....13, daily, 25.4.1994, 11.5.1994, 16.5.1994, 11.5.1994, '21.5.1994, 21-5-1994, 16.5.1994, that day, that day, 1969, Rule 8, Rule 11(5, that day, monthly, the previous year, eight weeks, eight weeks

TIME: 2.00 p.m., a few minutes, about 2.20 p.m., 2.30 p.m., 2 p.m., about 2.50 p.m., 2.00 p.m., 2.30 p.m., 2 p.m., about 2.20 p.m., 2.30 p.m., 2.20 p.m., 2.20 p.m., 2.30 p.m., 2.00 p.m., 2.20 p.m., 2 p.m., 2.00 p.m., 2.20 p.m., 2.30 p.m.

PERCENT: 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 9%

ORDINAL: 6th, 6th, 6th, 6th, 6th, third, third, 6th, 6th, 5th, 6th, first, 6th, 6th, third, 4th, 4th, first, first, first, first, first, first, 6th, 6th, 6th, 6th, 6th, 6th, first, first, first, second, 6th, first, second, 6th, 6th, 6th, 6th, 6th, 6th, first, 6th, 6th, 2nd

GPE: Counsel, US, US, Mumbai, Bhanwarlal, Jodhpur city, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, Ks.50, Counsel, Rajendra, Bombay, Ketail, W.A., Apex, Karnataka

NORP: Tender, Excise, Tender

FAC: Notice, the Appellant of Rs

WORK_OF_ART: the Arrack for the period

PRODUCT: Point No

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //