Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. M.R. Shivappa and ors.

Decided On : Jan-23-2003

Court : Karnataka

LAW: the Payment of Gratuity Act, Section 2(e, Section 2(e, Rule 26, Rule 49, Rule 49, Rule 49, Section 4, Article 12 or not'.11, Payment of Gratuity Act, Section 14 of the Act, this Gratuity Act, the Gratuity Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14, Section 14, Section 2(r, Section 2(q, Section 4(1, Section 33-C(2, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 3, Section 4, Section 7(2, Section 7(4)(a, Section 7(4)(b, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 7(7, Section 7(8, Section 8, the Payment of Gratuity Act, Section 33-C(2, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 14, Section 14

ORG: Kumar Rajaratnam 1, the Union of India, the Central Civil Services, the Appointing Authority, Ex-Military Pensioner, the Controllerate of Quality Assurance, Bangalore, Telecom Department, the Central Government, the Union of India, us.5, the Union of India, the Central Civil Services, the Appointing Authority, the Central Government, the Senior Counsel, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, State Government, the Central Civil Services, the Central Civil Services, follows:'In, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Legislation of the Payment of Gratuity Act, The Supreme Court, the Payment of Gratuity Act, The Supreme Court, Anr., Steel Authority of India Limited and, the Provident Fund, the Family Pension Scheme, the Bombay High Court, United India Insurance Company Limited, H.K. Khatau, I.C. 33, the Rajasthan High Court, Municipal Board, Gangapur v. Controlling Authority, LLN 663, Court, the Payment of Gratuity Act, the Payment of Gratuity Act, the Appellate Authority, the Controlling Authority, the Supreme Court, State of Punjab v. The Labour Court, Ors, AIR 1957, SC, SC, the Payment of Gratuity Act, the Payment of Gratuity Act, the Payment of Gratuity Act, the Payment of Gratuity Act, Parliament, A Controlling Authority, Parliament, the Controlling Authority, the Controlling Authority, the Controlling Authority, The Controlling Authority, the Controlling Authority, Court, the Controlling Authority, the Controlling Authority, the Controlling Authority under Section 7(4, the Appellate Authority, the Controlling Authority, the Controlling Authority, the Payment of Gratuity Act, a Controlling Authority, Government, Appellate Authority, Parliament, the Labour Court, The Supreme Court, Union of India, Anr, AIR 1981, SC, Court, the Supreme Court, Sri P.S., Central Government Standing Counsel

DATE: 3602 of 1997, 4960, 1999, 1972, 3602 of 1997, 23-8-1982, 12-12-1990, 31-5-1990, seven years, nine months, 1999, seven years five months, 1972, 23365, 1989, 26202 of 1992, 1999, 26202, 1992, ten years, the rate of, half month's, monthly, ten years, the rate of, half month's, monthly, 1972, 1984, 1984, 1987, 1969, 1969, 1969, 1957, 1947, 1908, two months, 2 weeks

CARDINAL: 26, 22-6-1988, one, 4960, 26(1, six, 49(1, six, 26(1, 2000)IILLJ1SC, 1987)1, 8, 8, 3,007/-, 1, 1981)ILLJ354SC, 121, 212

PERSON: Bellary, Dinesh Kumar, Ashok Haranahalli, Narayana, Manjula R. Kamadolli, Counsels, Dinesh Kumar, Dinesh Kumar, Balbir Kaur, Bhilwara, I.C. 575, Lodha, Lodha, Narayana Bhat, Manjula R. Kamadolli, Jullundur, Hariprasad Shivshankar Shukla, Anr, A.D. Divelkar

QUANTITY: 6-1-1981

LOC: Single, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single

PRODUCT: Rule 49(1, Single

GPE: gratuity.10, Counsel, Counsel, thereto.7, Kumar

NORP: Municipalities

ORDINAL: third

MONEY: nine per cent, nine per cent

PERCENT: 8%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //