State of Karnataka Vs. Mohammed Illyas

Decided On : Oct-04-1993

Court : Karnataka

LAW: the Motor Vehicles Act, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 127-B of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 200, Section 129-B of, Section 207, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 200, Section 200 of the Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 200 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Constitution, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 200 of the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 200, Section 200 of the Act, Constitution, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Article 14 of the Constitution and, Section 200, the Motor Vehicles Act.4, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 207, Section 207, Section 207, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Article 21, Section 93(1, Section 2(35, Section 86, Section 207, Section 2(43, Chapter, Chapter, Chapter, Chapter containing Section 207, Section 207, Section 207, Section 63(3)(m, Section 200(2, Section 86, Section 200, Article 14, Rule 81A, Section 200, Section 88(9, Section 200 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India?2, Article 14 of the Constitution of India?3, Article 14 of the Constitution of India?4, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 129-A of the Motor Vehicles, Act, Section 207, Section 2(29A, Section 2(3, Section 127B, Section 26, Section 112, Section 113, Section 113B, Section 114, Section 115, Section 116, Section 118, Section 120, Section 122, Section 123, Section 124, Section 125 or Section 127, Section 22, Section 42, Section 2(43, Section 2(7, Section 2(40, Section 66, Chapter-V, Section 70, Section 74, Section 73, Section 84, Section 88, Section 39, Section 66, Section 200, Section 178, Section 179, Section 180, Section 181, Section 182, Section 183, Section 184, Section 186, Section 189, Section 191, Section 192, Section 194, Section 196, Section 198, Section 207, Section 3 or Section 4 or Section 39, Section 66, Section 3 or Section 4, Section 66, Section 28, Section 212 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 114, Section 88, Section 127B of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 200 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 66(1, Section 192, Section 200, Section 200 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 53, Section 51, Section 52, a Full Bench Decision, Section 31, Section 29, Section 29, Section 129A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 127-B, Section 129-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 129-A of the, Section 207, Section 127-B of, Section 200 of the 1988 Act, Section 129-A, Section 22, Section 42(1, Section 123(1, Section 127-B, Section 123(1, Section 127-B of the Motor Vehicles Act.........., Section 132 of the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 207, Section 207, Section 207, Section 200, Section 207, Section 129-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 207, Section 129-A, Section 123, Section 129-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 123, Chapter VII of the Code, Section 91, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 129-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Article 226, Section 200, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 200 of the Act, Section 200, Section 200, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 200, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 200, Section 200, Section 127-B of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 200, Section 127-B of, Section 200 of 1988 Act, Section 200, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 200, Section 60, Section 33(1)(b, Section 33(1)(b, Section 74 of the 1988 Act, Section 88(9, Section 66(1, Section 192, Section 33(1, Constitutional, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 86, Section 200 of the Act, Section 86, Section 86, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Constitutional, Section 200, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200 Sub-section, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, Section 207, Section 207, Section 207, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 207, Section 207, Section 207, the Motor Vehicles Act, Chapter II, Section 28, Chapter, Chapter, Chapter III, Chapter, Section 38, Chapter, Chapter IV, Chapter, Section 64, Section 65, Chapter, Section 64, Chapter V, Section 96, Chapter VI, Chapter, Chapter, Chapter VII, Section 111, Chapter, Section 110, Chapter VIII, Section 138, Chapter, Chapter, Chapter, Chapter 11, Chapter, Chapter, Section 176, Chapter, Chapter, Chapter XIII, Chapter, Chapter Section 200 & 207, Chapter, Chapter 14, Section 213, Chapter, Motor Vehicles Act, Chapter, Chapter, Chapter 13, Chapter, Chapter 13, Chapter 13, Chapter XIV, Section 213(3, Section 207, Section 207, Section 213(3, Section 207, Section 213(3, Section 207, Section 207, the Constitutional Bench Decision, a Full Bench Decision of, Berar Municipalities Act, Section 207, Section 212(3, Section 207, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 207, Section 207, Section 207, Section 129A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 207 of, Section 129-A of, Section 207, Section 207, Section 129-A of, Section 129-A, Section 129-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Penal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 129-A, the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Section 129-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Criminal Procedure Code, Section 207, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 207, Section 207, Section 2(43, Section 2(7, Section 88(9, Section 2(40, Section 88(9, Section 88(9, Section 63(7, Section 88(9, Section 63(7, Section 2(3, Section 2(3, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 2(3, Section 3 with Section 4, the Taxation Act

ORG: S.B. Majmudar, These Writ Appeals, This Judgment of Swami, Order of Swami, the State of Karnataka &, the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, Writ Appeals, Tourist Vehicles or Stage Carriages, the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, Articles 14 & 19(1)(g, Tourist Vehicles, the Tourist Vehicles for Countrywide, State, State, Tourist Vehicles, Writ Appeals, the State of Karnataka, the Writ Petitioners, the Motor Vehicle, Stage Carriage, Petitions, Decision of Swami, Appeals, the State of Karnataka, State, Writ Appeals, Writ Petitions, ILR, KAR, Court, J., the Decision of the Supreme Court, HYDERABAD, ANR, Decisions of the Supreme Court, Court, Government Advocate, Entries, Standing Counsel for Central Government, the Decision of the Supreme Court, BOMBAY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ETC, Contract Carriage under Section 2(7, Tourist Vehicle, the Karnataka Rules, the State Government, Stage Carriage, J.'s Judgment, Act.10, Learned Counsel, the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, Government Advocate, the Decision of the Supreme Court, STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, Section 200 & 207, State, State, the Motor Vehicles Act, the State Government, under:'A, State Transport Authority, Commission, State Transport Authority, the Central Government, State, Sections 49, the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, the State Government, Certificate of Registration, the State Government, the Motor Vehicles Act, State, Regional Transport Authority, includes-(i, State Transport Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, State, State, the State Transport Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Central Government, State Transport Authority, State, State, the State Government, under:200, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, Rule 81A & Rule 259(2, KMV, the Motor Vehicles Department, the Motor Vehicles Department, Inspector of Motor, The Central Government, Central Motor Vehicles Rules, the Executive Magistrate, the State Transport Authority or Regional Transport Authority, Registered AD Post, Authority, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, the State Transport Authority, the State Government, State, the State of Karnataka, Inspector of Police, State, Sub-Inspector of Police (Traffic, City of Bangalore, Inspector of Motor Vehicles of the Motor Vehicles Department, the State of Karnataka, Inspectors of Motor Vehicles of, the Motor Vehicle Department, Government Advocate, State, the Decision of the Supreme Court, ITR, the Supreme Court, Officer, Supreme Court, Government Advocate, Court, S.V. BAGI v. STATE OF, Court, the Supreme Court, The Transport, Hyderabad, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, T. NANJAPPA, SONS, ANR, the Decisions of the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Magistrate, State, the State Authorities, Government Advocate, State, AIR 1983, SC, the Criminal Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, J., Judicial, the Decision of Swami, Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, Government Advocate, negative.16, Inspectors of Motor Vehicles of, the Motor Vehicles Department, Judicial, the State Government, Court, the Decision of Swami, the State of Karnataka, Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, ILR, KAR, this High Court, the Motor Vehicles Act, Court, ILR, KAR, Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, Point, a Transport Authority, the Transport Authority, the State Government, the State Government, the Official Gazette, Legislature, the State Government, Legislature, State, the State Government, the Official Gazette, State, Legislative, Legislature, Legislative, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Conductors of Stage Carriages, the State Government, Motor Vehicles, the Central Government, the State Government, the State Government, State Transport Undertakings, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Chapter IX, Central Government, Insurance of Motor Vehicles, Central Government, XII, the State Government, Sections, the State Government, Section 213, the State Government, Motor Vehicles Department, the State Government, Sections 200 & 207, Legislature, the State Government, Motor Vehicles Department, Sections 200 & 207, State, the State Government, the State Government, Motor Vehicles Department, the State Government, the State Government, the Motor Vehicles Department, Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, the State Government, the State Government, Motor Vehicles Department, the Supreme Court, P. BALAKOTAIAH v., UNION OF INDIA, COLLECTOR, KHANDWA, Madhya Pradesh High Court, C.P., the Supreme Court, AIR 1958, SC, the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, the State Government, State, Section, Legislature, the State Government, the State Government, Section, the Decision of the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Sections 200 & 207, the Supreme Court, The Andhra Pradesh High Court, Court, Court, Court, The High Court, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Supreme Court, State, the State Government by Rules, the Supreme Court, Counsel against Section 207, 4th Point, Point, the Supreme Court, ORS, v. UNION OF INDIA, the Supreme Court, the Motor Vehicles Act, State Transport Authority, the Central Government, State, the Supreme Court, Inter-State, the State Transport Authority, State, State, State, State, the State Transport Authorities, State, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, HIDAYATULLAH, INDIAN TELEPHONE INDUSTRIES, BANGALORE, BANGALORE, this High Court, Omnibus, the Division Bench, Company, Company, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Tadipatri, the Motor Vehicles Inspector, Anantapur-Tadipatri Road, Tadipatri, the Motor Vehicles Inspector, the Motor Vehicles Inspector, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the State Government

DATE: 1939, 1988, 1939, 1132-1183, 1993, 1083-1127, 1992, 12.12.1990, 13.11.1986, 1988, 1989, 1988, 1988, 1989, 13.11.1986, 1988, 1990, 13.11.1986, 1981, 2804, 1988, 1989, 1985]3SCR1 12, 1988, 13.11.1986, 1989, 1989, 1939, 1988, 50, 51, 57, 58, 60, 61, 1982, 1988, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, six months, 1989, 38, 65, 95, 1988, 1989, more than two months, a day to day, every 3 months, a period'of, 3 years, 4).14, 1988, 13.11.1986, 25.10.1990., 64, 1988, 1988, 1922, 1957, 1939, 2828, 1986, 12251, 2843, 13.11.1986, 13.11.1986, 13.11.1986, 25.10.1990, 13.11.1986, 1939, 13.11.1986, 1988, 1988, 1988, 1989, 1939, 1939, 25.9.1984, seven days, the quarter ending

GPE: Karnataka, MOHAMMED ILLYAS v., MOHAMMED ILLYAS, us.2, Nos.2, Swami, MOHAMMED ILLYAS v., Swami, Swami, Swami, Proviso, P.C., Contract Carriage, Swami, India, India, Karnataka, Hindi, hirer.(11, Circles, Swami, Decision, Swami, Swami, Swami, Rules, Swami, India, Counsel, Chapters, SHARMA, EAST NIMAR, Transport, B.A., India, India, India, States, States, States, States, Manipur, Nagaland, India, States, India, States, States, States, States, States, Nagaland, Manipur, States, Karnataka, Karnataka, Karnataka, States, Karnataka, States, Singanamala

PERSON: Swami, J., Swami, J., Mohammed Illyas, Writ Petitioners, Writ Petitioners, Entries Nos, Writ Petitioners, Writ Petitioners, J., Swami, J., Notification, J., Dattu, Swami, S.SARDAR ALI, Swami, J., Dattu, Dattu, Dattu, Swami, J., Narasimha Murthy, Swami, Datar, J., Datar, Karnataka Rule 113, Aibal, Narasimhachar, Narasimhachar, Dattu, AIR1986AP7, V. Govindarajulu, Writ Petitioners, Vehicle, Contract Carriage, Gazette, Schedule, Notification, Officers, Dattu, Dattu, Andhra Pradesh, Anr, S. Sardar Ali, Chinnappa Reddy, J., Mohammed Illyas, Swami, J., Swami, J., Swami, J., Swami, J., Swami, J., Swami, J., Swami, J., Swami, J., Mohammed Illyas, J., Dattu, Justice Swami, Notification, Gazette, Swami, J., J., Notification, Notification, Swami, J., Narasimha Murthy, A.B. CHINAGI v. REGISTERING AUTHORITY & RTO, CANCELLATION, Sri, Narasimha Murthy, Narasimha, Sri Narasimha Murthy, Writ Petitioners, Swami, Mohammed Illyas, Gazette, Notification, Swami, J., J., Swami, Mohammed Illyas, Writ Petitioners, Sri Narasimhachar, Narasimhachar, Narasimhachar, Gazette, Narasimhachar, Narasimhachar, Ali, Chinnappa Reddy, J., Narasimhachar, Narasimhachar, Writ Petitioners, Dattu, Chinnappa Reddy, J., J.

PRODUCT: Notifications, the 'Act', Notifications, Notifications, the Full Bench, Section the Full Bench, Notifications, Notifications, Notifications, Judgment, Notifications, the Full Bench of, Act.19.4, the Full Bench of, Report

CARDINAL: 25.10.1990, 16, two, 16, 64, 4, One, 1988.3, 259(2, 1983]3SCR729, 64, 10 and 25, 3, 2840, 1, 259(2J, 2843, 27, 8, 25.10.1990, 259(2, 1988?5, two, order?Our, 2, 3, 4, more than six, one, 1, 59 59A, 64, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 39, 35, one, more than six, 1, one, one, 9, 1, 14, less than three, 89, 14, 1, 1, two thousand, three thousand, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, impose.(vi, 107, 111, 138, 178, 1, 2, 259, 2, 130, 132, 133, 134, 136, 158, 200, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 85, 85, 9, 2, One, five, two, 10, 2, 1,000/-, 16, 50, 10, 500/-, 25, 50, 27, 30, 1, 2, one thousand, one thousand, three, three, three, 14, 22, 277, 1983]3SCR729, 2840, 27, 1, 2, 200, 25.10.1990, 2, one, 60, 10, 60, 2, 3, Two, 200, 207, 259(2, 259(2, 259(2, 1, 259(2, 259(2, 259(2, 1, 165, 174, 3, 259(2, 212, 213(3, 252, four, 1983]3SCR729, 6, 259(2, one, more than six, one, one, one, One, one, two, two, 1983]3SCR624, 3, fifty, 1965]1SCR841, two, two, two, 27, one, only two, 49, 5/-, 30.9.1984.In, 22, one

NORP: Petitions, Rules, Rules, Tourist, Rules, Rules, Rules

ORDINAL: second, first, first, second, second, third, second, firstly, third, Secondly, Second

FAC: the Official Gazette, the Official Gazette, Sections 73, 74,, the Official Gazette, State(s

QUANTITY: 1939 Act Section 2, sixty centimeters diameter.(8

LOC: under:-(a, the Writ Petitioners

LANGUAGE: English, Chapters

TIME: under this Act, 4 p.m.

EVENT: the 1988 Act

WORK_OF_ART: 'All India Permits'