Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rajivi Vs. Srinivasa Hegde

Decided On : Apr-01-1993

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 115 C.P.C., Section 21, Section 21(1)(a)(b, Section 21(1)(h, Section 21, Section 21(1)(h, Section 21(1)(h, Section 3 of the Act, Section 2(11, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 15(1, Section 23, Section 23, Section 21(1)(f, Section 22, Section 3, Section 3 of the Act, Section 3 of the Act, the Karnataka Act, Section 141, Section 2(11, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 59, the Karnataka Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Karnataka Act, Order 22, the Karnataka Act, the Karnataka Act, Section 51, the Karnataka Act, the Karnataka Act, the Karnataka Act, Section 51, the Karnataka Act, Section 51, the Karnataka Act, Section 3(r, the Karnataka Act, Section 51, the Karnataka Act, the Karnataka Act, Section 5(11)(c, the Bombay Act, Section 5(11)(c, the Bombay Act, Section 51, the Karnataka Act, Section 51, the Karnataka Act, Section 2(h, Rule 4, Order 22, Order 21 C.P.C., Section 2(11, Section 3, Section 14, Section 21(1)(f, Section 21(1)(f, Section 21(1)(f

ORG: ORDERMirdhe, This Civil Revision Petition, RRP, the Karnataka Rent Control Act, Revision Petition, follows:-It, the Court of the Munsiff and Rent Controller, Laxmi, Annappa Bhandary, the Court of the District Judge, Revision, Court, the Supreme Court, Hotel, Lodging House Rates Control Act, Court, Legislature, Court, SHREE CHAMUNDI MOPEDS LTD, SOUTH INDIA TRUST ASSOCIATION, MADRAS, the Supreme Court, the Karnataka Rent Control Act, the Karnataka Rent Control Act, Court, KLJ, Court, the Karnataka Rent Control Rules, the State Government, Sections 14, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Bombay High Court, Court, Statutory Tenancies, KISHAN, ANR, Act, the Rent Controller, the Rent Control Court, ANR, Court, the Delhi Rent Control Act, the Delhi Rent Control Act, Section, South Asia Industries Private Ltd.

NORP: J.1, A.I.R., Statutory Tenants

DATE: 11.3.1988, 1986, 1961, 1978, 1986, 1986, 1984, 43, 1958, Section 13(2)(ii)(a).'10, four months'

LOC: the District Judge, SOUTH ASIA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD

PERSON: Mangalore, Dakshina Kannada, Dakshina Kannada, Dakshina Kannada, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, Dakshina Kannada, Laxmi, Laxmi, Laxmi, Laxmi, K. ABDUL SUBHAN v., A.K. SATYANARAYANA, Ganapathadha, AIR1976Bom288, Bal Kishan v. Om Prakash, Anr, Laxmi, Rajivi, Laxmi, Lordships, Sarup Singh

GPE: Puttur, Puttur, Puttur, Puttur, C.P.C., follows:-''Legal, SETTY, Plain, S.C., Damadilal, J.C., Followed, Landlord

CARDINAL: 18, 1)(h, 1, 94, 137, 1986]1SCR1, 5(11)(c)(ii, 15, 11, 11, 1992]2SCR999, 1, 1, 1985.'In, 2, 72, 33, 34, 35, 30, 30, 2, 27, 2, 2, 3(r, one, BAL, 1986]3SCR622, 2, 30, 1973]1SCR850, 1964]4SCR892, 1965]3SCR829, 18, 25

PRODUCT: Laxmi

FAC: the Bombay Rents, Laxmi, Laxmi, Laxmi

ORDINAL: second, second, second

EVENT: S.C. 955, the Bombay Act, the Bombay Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //