Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gangadhar Gurusiddappa Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Decided On : Jun-29-1962

Court : Karnataka

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 80, Article 311 of the Constitution and, Article, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Article 311, Article 311, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution.11, Rule 148(3, Article 311 of the Constitution, Rule 148(3, Rule 148(3, Rule 148(3, Section 240(2, Rule 148(3, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution.15, Article 14 of the Constitution, Rule 143, Rule 148(3, the Railway Establishment Code, Article 311 of the Constitution and, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 311, Article, Section 240, Rule 148(3, the Railway Establishment Code, Section 240, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311, Article 311, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution, the Railway Establishment Code, Chapter XVII

PERSON: T.K. Tukol, Hubli, Controller, Hubli, M. Krishnaswamy, Clerk, Sadashiva, Controller, T.115, Clerk, Ex, Clerk, Controller, Mahendra, Satyagraha, Mahendra, Prem Biharilal, Articles 310, Lordships, C. P., Berar V. Shamshul Hussain, Gurdip Singh v. State of Punjab, Krishnaswamy, Vol, Ex, Controller, G. G. Jamakhandi, Sd/- Kamalakar Rao, Indian Railway Establishment Code, Krishnaswamy, Lordships, Lordships, Chandra Chiki, S. Chakravarti, Foreman, Lordships, Mahendra, Priya Gupta, Gorakhpur, Lordships, Waman Balkrishna Bokare, Lordships, Krishnaswamy, N. S. Nagaraja Rao v. State of Mysore, P. L. Dhingra v. Union, Prescott Singh v. Utter, S. M. Doshi, Rule 148, AIR1959Pat192, Promode Ranjan Roy v. Life Insurance Corporation of India

NORP: J.1, Southern Mahratta Railway, Rules, East Indian, Satish, Rules, North Eastern, AIR1959All643, Rules

ORG: Special Suit, the Court of the Civil Judge, Hubli (District Dharwar, the District Transportation Superintendent, Hubli, the Southern Railways, The District Transportation Superintendent,, Intimated, The District Transportation Superintendent, the District Transportation Superintendent (Traffic, the District Transportation Superintendent, the Union of India, Ext, the District Transportation Superintendent, Court, Southern Mahratta Railway Company, the Union Government, Company, the Government of India, Circular, Circular, the Southern Mahratta Railway Company, the Government of India, State, the Supreme Court, the State of M.P. v., AIR 1961, SC, Departmental, the District Transportation Superintendent, Medical Certificates, the District Medical Officer, Reliance, AIR, the Anti-Corruption Department, Tank, Government, follows:'In, the Nagpur High Court, AIR 1949, Court, the Punjab High Court, Lordships, the District Transportation Superintendent by Ex, Sub Head, Ext, Railway, the District Transportation Superintendent,, the District Transportation Superintendent, ToMr, Hubli, the Indian Railway Establishment Code, Railway Servants, the Railway Administration, Railway, the Indian Railway Establishment Code, the Railway Authorities, the Calcutta High Court, Lordships, the Railway Administration, the Railway Administration, Blacksmith, Railway, A Committee of Enquiry, Works, the Committee of Enquiry, Authorities, Administration, Administration, Administration, the Railway Administration, Lordships, the Railway Administration, the Railway Administration, the Court of Appeal, the Railway Administration, the Railway Authorities, Lordships, the Patna High Court, Eastern Rly, the Railway Authorities, Departmental, Administration, the Government of India Act, Calcutta, the Government of India, the Workshop Medical, Authorities, the Supreme Court, a Railway Servant, Railway, the Railway Authorities, the Assam Railway Labourers Association, the Trade Union, the Bombay High Court, Kishan Prasad v. Union of India, the Government under Rules 1707 and, the Government of India Act, the Railway Authorities, the Railway Authorities, the Government of India Act, the Railway Authorities, this High Court, the Provident Fund and Gratuity, General Provident Fund, the Supreme Court, Court, Lordships, Lordships, State of Uttar Pradesh, Lordships, Lordships, the Civil Service Rules, Brakesman, Lordships, Government, Minder the Rules, Lordships, Union of India, Railway, Lordships, Nageshwar Prasad v. State of Bihar, the Calcutta High Court, the Life Insurance Corporation, Corporation, Divisional, Corporation, Court

CARDINAL: 16, 7, three, 17, 8, 27-3-1951, 17, 21, 11-2-1950, 22-2-1950, 27-2-1950, 14, 16, 17, 80, 160, two, 19-8-1950, 12, 23, 8, 3-1-1951, 7, 3, 8, 1, 22-3-1951, 27-3-1951, 8, 27-3-1951, 22-3-1951, 22, 4 and 8, 124, 12, 11, 1, 11-6-1945, 11-2-1950, 2, 4, 22, 166, 17, 14, 17, 160/-.Some, 23-12-1950, 161, 26, 23-12-1950, 14, 26, 166, 27, 16, 49, 311, one, two, two, 97, 87, 19-8-1950, 12, 27-10-1950, 109, 7, 1, 18, 110, 111, 50, 22-3-1951, 50.13, 4, 1957)ILLJ272Cal, two, 18, 10, 08, two, 1953]4SCR655, 1960)IILLJ326Cal, one, 23, two, 1954)IILLJ139SC, 1957)ILLJ494Cal, six, 1958)ILLJ544SC, 1958]1SCR509, 1958]1SCR571, 3, 4, two

DATE: 1954, 1945, 15th January 1950, the next day, that day, 18-1-1950, Rule 1702, 17-5-1950, three years, 21-5-1950, 10-8-1950, 20th July, 1950, 1950, three months, more than three months, 9th January 1951, 380/- per month, month, the 15th and 16th January 1950, only to three months, one month's, 30th June 1956, 55, three months, month, one month's, one month's, 160/- per month, 1623, 85, Rule 1702, May 1950, that - day, 29th December 1950, three years, 160/- per month, a period of, three months, 63, one week, 64, week, 23rd, May two, 1954, 17th May 1950, 3rd July 1950, 160/- per month, 20th July 1950, 10-8-1950, 20th July 1950, Rule 1702, August, 70, 71, 21-11-1950, three-months' period, 10th December 1950, 23rd December 1950, three months, 380/- per month, 380/- per month, 3403, 22nd March 1951, 10493, Monday, the 8th January 1951, the expiry of 27th March 1951.3, month, '12, 22nd March 1951, the 22nd March 1951, month, one month's, 1708, 1709, 1709, Rule 1708, June 1945, one month's, 1708, one month's, one month's, one month, month, month, one month's, 1935, one month's, 1709, 1935, one month's, Rule 1709, the expiry of 27th March 1951, one month's, one month's, 1708, the current month, one month's, two months'

LOC: Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras

EVENT: the Railway Establishment Code, the Railway Establishment Code

FAC: Railway, Departmental, Departmental, the Railway Servants, Railway, Suspension, Railway, the Railway Authorities, the Additional Superintendent, Departmental

ORDINAL: second, second, firstly, first, first, second, first, first, second, 15th, second, Firstly, Secondly, second, second, 3rd, second, first, first, second, first, first, first, second

QUANTITY: 6-1-1951, 10-2-1954, 8-2-1950, 6-1-1951, 18-2-1953

TIME: 9-1-1951, 9-1-1951, 9-1-1951, terms:'I am

GPE: Provincial Govt, Ex, Prasadi v. Works, Bhagwandas, Fakir, Rly, Dalip, Singh v. State of Punjab, Shyamlal, Bombay, Askaran

WORK_OF_ART: Officers, a Conductor of the Bangalore Transport Company, Officers

PRODUCT: D.T.S.T/ Hubli, Rule 148, Rule 148 of the Railway Establishment Code, Rule 148, Benefit

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //