Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jyothi Home Industries Etc. Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Decided On : Apr-15-1993

Court : Karnataka

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 7(2, Section 7(2, the Amendment Act No, the Apprentices Act, the Standing Orders of the establishment, Section 1, Section 1 of the Act, Section 1 of the Act, Section 16, Section 1(5, Section 1 of the Act, Section 1 of the Act, Section 2 of the Act, the Apprentices Act, Section 2(f, Section 1 of the Act, Section 2 of the Act, Section 2(9, the ESI Act, Section 2(9, the ESI Act, the Apprentices Act, Section 2, Section 2(f, Section 2 of the Act, Section 2, Paras 30, Paras 30, the ESI Act

CARDINAL: 1, 681 and 682, 2., 6, 3, 1, 1971)ILLJ416SC, 4., 681, 5., two, 1, 1, 6., 8, 681 and 682, 26, 20, 20, 9, 1986]159ITR856(SC, 1986)ILLJ155SC, 10, 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 33/1988, 14, two, 15.1, two, 16, 3, 3, 3, only 18, 19, two, three, 3, 3, 3, 3, 7, 9, 7, 8, one, 9, 3, 3, two, One, 9, 11, two, 16.1, 16.2, 3, 26, 1, 3, 157, 20, 16.5, II, 2(9, 9, 16.6, 1, 2, 17, 3, 17.1, 12, 2, 26(1, 12, 689, 26, 32, 30, 32(1, 21, 22, 23, 17.2, 20, 17.3, 1,600, 17.4, 20, 3, 18, one, 1 to 3, 19, 20

PERSON: Order, Notification, Order, Hariharn, Rajasthan, Sri Shylendra Kumar, Notification, Points Nos, Scheme, Shri Shylendra Kumar, Schedule, Schedule, Nos, Notification, Mayur Bhavan, Counter Affidavits, Vikram Mahajan, xxx xxx xxx , Scheme, Sri Kasturi

DATE: January 22, 1993, 25471, 25472, 1990, 1993, 1952, October 19, 1990, 1952, October 19, 1990, January 7, 1991, 8, 1991, October 19, 1992, October 19, 1990, a day, a few days in a month, October 19, 1990, October 19, 1990, three months', less than 60 days, a period of, three months, 1993, 1993)ILLJ833Kant, 1993, October 19, 1990, November 1, 1990, October 19, 1990, October 19, 1990, the beginning of the month, three month's, 60 days, a period of, three months, the day, as to 90 days, 60 days, more than 60 days, the day, 30 days, October 19, 1990, Para 26, 1)(a, October 19, 1990, August 1, 1988, 1961, 52 of 1961, 1962, ' 15, a day, a day, August, 1963, November 20, 1956, 1961, June to September 1961, the period June to September 1961, the year, 360 days, one year, more than 60 days, 90 days, 60 days, October 19, 1990, 1961, 52 of 1961, the day, 1)(a, 1986, '7, 1986, 1948, 1961, 52 of 1961, '8, October 19, 1990, 1)(a, November 1, 1990, a later date, Para 38(1, August 26, 1991, 2689, fifteen days, twenty-five days, the month, monthly, the current month, the current month, Para 76, October 19, 1990, August 26, 1991, August 26, 1991, October 19, 1990, October 19, 1990, 1952, October 19, 1990, the current month, Para 38(1, October 1, 1984, Para 30, Para 32, 32, April 30, 1986, October 1, 1984, October 1, 1984 to, 30, 1986', October 1, 1984 to, 30, 1986, more than two years, October 19, 1990, October 19, 1990, November 1, 1990, October 19, 1990, '10, monthly, today, monthly, 1600-3000/-, January 22, 1993, November 1, 1990, a later date, January 22, 1993

ORG: Singe, the Employees Provident Funds, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, the Supreme Court, The Provident Fund Inspector, T.S.Hariharan, The Supreme Court, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Scheme, the Supreme Court, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, the Provident Fund Officer, Scheme, Scheme, the Supreme Court, LLN, Scheme, Scheme, the Provident Fund, Senior Standing Counsel, Central Government, Writ Appeals, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Hariharan, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Senior Standing Counsel, the Central Government, Senior Standing Counsel, the Central Government, Court, the Provident Fund, Court, Scheme, Judgment, Senior Standing Counsel, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, AIR 1979 SC, Scheme, Scheme, the Supreme Court, Scheme, Scheme, The Estimates Committee, P.F. Membership, The Committee, The Central Government, Committee, Government, Committee, The Central Board of Trustees, the Estimates Committee, The Board, Board, Board, Board, Scheme, the Supreme Court, Senior Standing Counsel, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, the Supreme Court, the Provident Fund Scheme, Senior Standing Counsel, the Central Government, Hariharan, Scheme, Learned Counsel, Court, Clauses, Writ Petition, the High Court, the New Cochin Cafe, Court, Clauses, Lordships, Clauses, Government, the High Court, Scheme, Senior Standing Counsel for Central Government, Hariharan, Senior Standing Counsel for Central Government, Scheme, Scheme, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Judgment, the Estimates Committee, the Central Government, Estimates Committee, The Central Government, Scheme, Scheme, Senior Standing Counsel for Central Government, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, the Supreme Court, Scheme, the Supreme Court, the Provident Fund Scheme, Learned Senior Standing Counsel for Central Government, the Supreme Court, Andhra University v. Regional Provident Fund, Scheme, the Supreme Court, Court, University, Department of Publications and Press, University, University, University, Scheme, University, University, the Supreme Court, Harrow, Scheme, Court, Press, University, the Supreme Court, Andhra University's, Reliance, Supreme, E. S.I. Corporation, S.I. Flour Mills, P) Ltd., Employees' State Insurance Act, the Indian Naval, the Central Government, the Central Government, P) Ltd., the Supreme Court, Reliance, the Supreme Court, P.M. Patel & Sons v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, Scheme, Scheme, the Supreme Court, Scheme, Scheme, the Supreme Court, Scheme, the Supreme Court, Senior Standing Counsel, the Central Government, Court, Court, Scheme, E-1, the Regional Provident Fund, Central Provident Fund, the Supreme Court, District Exhibitors Association, Union of India, Court, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Union of India ILR, Scheme, the Central Government, Scheme, the Provident Fund, Scheme, Scheme, this High Court, High Courts, the Regional Provident Fund, Central Provident Fund, E-1, Regional Provident Fund, Central Provident Fund, 9th Floor, all Regional Provident Fund Commissioners/ Sub-Regional Offices, CSR, High Courts, The Ministry of Labour, Government of India, the Ministry of Law, Government of India, the Hon'ble High Courts, the Ministry of Labour, Government of India, Hon'ble High Court, Scheme, Scheme, the Supreme Court, District Exhibitors Association, the Supreme Court, Scheme, Scheme, Counsel for the Central Government, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, the High Court, Senior Standing Counsel for Central Government, the Supreme Court, District Exhibitors Association, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Court, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Union of India, the Writ Petition, Court, Court, Corporation, Court, Court, Court, the E.S.I. Corporation, Scheme, the Writ Petitions, Senior Standing Counsel, the Central Government, Scheme, Court, Scheme, Scheme, Senior Standing Counsel for Central Government

PRODUCT: Para, Para 26, Para 26, 311, Para 26(1, Para, Para, Ongole, Ongole, Para, Para, Para, Para 26, Para 38, Para 26(1, Para 26(1, Para 32(1, Para 32(1, Para, Para, Point Nos

LOC: Single, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single

WORK_OF_ART: Notification, Scheme, 'The Act, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Orders

GPE: Guntur, Hariharan, Hariharan, Hariharan, W.A., Hariharan, Sri Kasturi, Counsel, W.A., Counsel, Hariharan, 124th, Hariharan, Hariharan, Hariharan, Hariharan, Hariharan, Hariharan, Hariharan, Clause, Hariharan, Clause, S.I., Clause, Hariharan, Hariharan, Hariharan, Muzaffarnagar, Workmen, D.P.F.C., Muzaffarnagar, Pandora, Workmen

ORDINAL: 8th, 78th, first, First, third, third, third, third

TIME: about a couple of hours

EVENT: Para 32(1

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //