Hajee Abdul Sattar Sait Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Decided On : Jun-11-1990

Court : Karnataka

LAW: section 27, section 7(1, section 7(1, section 7(1, section 7(1, section 7(1, section 7(1, section 7 of the Act

PERSON: M. Rama Jois, Bangalore Bench, Bangalore, CWT, P. N. Sikand, Kant Jha v., CWT, Kant Jha v., Subject

CARDINAL: eight, 2, 3, 4., 5, 1974]96ITR424(Delhi, 1977]107ITR922(SC, 13, 6, 103, 7, 1976]104ITR625(Mad, 8, 9, 1976]104ITR625(Mad, 10

DATE: 1957, 7(1, 1957, the assessment year 1963-64, 1957

ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tibunal, the Delhi High Court, the Supreme Court, CWT, the Delhi Development Authority, the Delhi Development Authority, the Delhi Development Authority, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Legislature, Legislature, T. S. Srinivasa Iyer, the Supreme Court, T. S. Srinivasa Iyer

MONEY: 2(m, 2(m, fifty per cent, only 50 per cent, 50 pet cent

FAC: Infantry Road

GPE: P. N. Sikand, Pandit, Pandit