Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Nestle India Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Mysore Ii Division
Decided On : Mar-07-2003
Court : Karnataka
LAW: Chapter 21, Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, Section 11-B of the Central Excise Act, Section 11-B, Section 11-B of the Central Excise Act, Section 11-B, the Central Excise Act, Section 11-B, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11-B. Facts, Section 11, Section 35-F, Section 11-B(1
ORG: ORDERR, Nestle India Limited, the Commissioner of Customs, Appellate Authority, Appellate Authority, Customs, Tribunal, Notice, Court, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, the Bombay High Court, Suvidhe Limited v. Union of India, Learned Counsel, Oswal Agro Mills Limited v. Union of India, Learned Counsel, High Courts, Bombay High Court, Suvidhe Limited's, Madras High Court, Oswal Agro Mills Limited, Suvidhe Limited, Court, Tribunal, the Union of India, CC No, The Supreme Court, the Union of India, the Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Annexure-H, the Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court, Madras High Courts, the Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court, Department, Court, The Bombay High Court, Department, The Supreme Court, the Apex Court, the Bombay High Court, Court, Central Excise (Legal, the Central Government, Court, Court, Department
NORP: J.1
PERSON: Schedule, Counsels, ELT
DATE: 1985, 1991-94, January 1995, 16-9-1997, 15-7-1999, 6283 of 1998, 1998, six months, 20-4-2000, 3522 of 1996, 4) weeks, 2000, 7-8-1996, October, 1999
CARDINAL: 29, 7, 7, 31, 28-12-1999, 6,22,89,723.00, 7, 7, 6.22, 3-5-2000, 3, 23, 177, 13-10-1999, 2, 7, 28-3-2000, one, two, 2, 77,10,277.00, 10,000.00, 10,000.00, four, 3, 23, 2, two, 10,000.00
GPE: redetermina, Counsel, DD, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Bombay
MONEY: 1999-(XC2)-GJX-4666-MAD, 15 per cent, 15 per cent, 15 per cent
ORDINAL: 3rd