Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Consolidated Coffee Ltd. Vs. Agricultural Income-tax Officer and Another
Decided On : Nov-02-1993
Court : Karnataka
LAW: section 20, section 20 of the Act, section 20, section 20, section 18, section 5, section 19, Section 20, Section 20, section 20, section 20, section 20, section 141, section 141, section 141, section 20, section 20, section 20
PERSON: K. Shivashankar Bhat, Sarangan, Pleader
NORP: J.1, Rules, Rules
DATE: year ended with June 30, year 1988-89, (previous year ending on June 30, 1987, annual, 1957, the years 1984-85, 1985-86, 1986-87, '20, 1969]71ITR799(SC, 1961, 1969]71ITR799(SC, 1961, earlier years, earlier years, 1961
ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first
CARDINAL: 8, 8, 9(c, 8.60, 12, 9.58, 9(c, 8, 1, 2, 1, 805, 2, 510, 9(c, 1991]191ITR472(KAR, 1991]191ITR472(KAR, 1991]191ITR472(KAR
ORG: the Coffee Bard, the Supreme Court, Jaipur Udyog Ltd., CIT, the Supreme Court, Jaipur Udyog Ltd., CIT, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Salar Jung Sugar Mills Ltd., Bench, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Bench, Honey Comb Estate v. Agrl., ITO, Honey Comb Estate v. Agrl., ITO, Honey Comb Estate's, Act.10
WORK_OF_ART: State of Mysore