Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Consolidated Coffee Ltd. Vs. Agricultural Income-tax Officer and Another

Decided On : Nov-02-1993

Court : Karnataka

LAW: section 20, section 20 of the Act, section 20, section 20, section 18, section 5, section 19, Section 20, Section 20, section 20, section 20, section 20, section 141, section 141, section 141, section 20, section 20, section 20

PERSON: K. Shivashankar Bhat, Sarangan, Pleader

NORP: J.1, Rules, Rules

DATE: year ended with June 30, year 1988-89, (previous year ending on June 30, 1987, annual, 1957, the years 1984-85, 1985-86, 1986-87, '20, 1969]71ITR799(SC, 1961, 1969]71ITR799(SC, 1961, earlier years, earlier years, 1961

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

CARDINAL: 8, 8, 9(c, 8.60, 12, 9.58, 9(c, 8, 1, 2, 1, 805, 2, 510, 9(c, 1991]191ITR472(KAR, 1991]191ITR472(KAR, 1991]191ITR472(KAR

ORG: the Coffee Bard, the Supreme Court, Jaipur Udyog Ltd., CIT, the Supreme Court, Jaipur Udyog Ltd., CIT, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Salar Jung Sugar Mills Ltd., Bench, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Bench, Honey Comb Estate v. Agrl., ITO, Honey Comb Estate v. Agrl., ITO, Honey Comb Estate's, Act.10

WORK_OF_ART: State of Mysore

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //