Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Stumpp Schuele and Somappa Ltd. and Vs. State of Karnataka,

Decided On : Sep-24-1985

Court : Karnataka

LAW: the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25, Constitution, S. 25-O, Act 46 of 1982, Chapter V-B, the Companies Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Enclosures 1 to 9, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act 2(CC, Constitution, S. 25, S. 25-O, S. 25-O, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Act 46 of 1982, Constitution, Section 25, Section 25, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Chapter V-A of the Act, S. 25-R, S. 25-R, Chapter V-B of the Act, the Amending Act, Constitution, S. 25, S. 25-O, Section 25(O, S. 25, S. 25-O, S. 25-O. 23, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Constitution, S. 25-F, Constitution, Constitution, Chapter V-B of the Act, S. 25-O, the Industrial Disputes Act, S. 25-O, Section 25, the Industrial Dispute Act, Constitution

CARDINAL: two, one, 2, 25, less than 300, 25, 25(P, 1, 2, 3, less than 300, less than 100, about 1000, 28, 90, 15, 107, 24, 14, 69, 107, 17, 1, 2, 300, 3, 4., 25, 28, 90, 103, 24, 14, 103, 4, 90, four, 1, 2, 3, four, about 1000, 3, 10, 2, 8, 31,65,021, 8, 4., 6., 100, 90, two, 3, 6, 19, 19(6, 1, two, 1974)ILLJ499SC, more than 100, more than 1000, 4, 18.10, 25, 21, 300A, 5., 18-12, 5.1, 18.13, 300A, 5.2, 25, 21, 6, 18.14, 18.15, 14, 8., 18.16, 25, 9, 18.17, 10, 18.18, 25, 25, 11, 18.19, 6, 1., 1, 2., 2, 1, 1, 3., 3, 1, 1, 4., 4, 3, 5, 5, 5, 1, 3, 2, 6, 6, 1, 1, 3, 1, 3, 7, 1, 4, 1, 8, 2, 3, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 25, 8., 1, two, 22, as many as fifteen, 9, 25, 527, 538, 539, two, 25, two, 10, 26, 27, one, 1961)ILLJ631SC, 235, 34, 11, 6, 19, 12, 13, 25, 14, 1970]1SCR457, 15, 27, 17, 1954]1SCR803, 8), 4(3, 32, 226, 18, 19, 25, 26, 20, 21, 6, 19, 25, 25, 22, 100, 8012 and 8013, two, over a hundred, 56, 24, two, one, 486, 487, 486, 487, 25, 25, 8), 25, one, 26, 27, 30, 28, 8), 29, two, 6, 19, 30, 24, 1, 2, 3, 4, 31, 499, 507, 32, 33, 34, 35, 1, 2

ORG: Schuele and Somappa Limited, the Industrial Disputes Amendment Act, The Supreme Court, Excel Wear v. Union of India, The Supreme Court, the Industrial Disputes (Amendment, Bangalore, Nippon Electronics, Nippon Electronics, Nippon Electronic, the High Court, the Electronics Division, Nippon Electronics, the Electronics Division, the State Government, the State Government, Government of Karnataka, Social Welfare & Labour Dept., WITHOUT, Stumpp, Schuele & Somappa Ltd., Annexure, S. 25-N of the Industrial Disputes Act, Stumpp, Schuele & Somappa Ltd., (Electronics Division, Nippon Electronics, Stumpp Schuele & Somappa Ltd., Bankers and Financial Institutions, Nippon Electronics, the High Court, Nippon Electronics, Stumpp, Schuele & Somappa Ltd., Nippon Electronics, as Electronics Division, Stumpp Schuele & Somappa Limited, Bankers, Industrial Credit & Investment Corporation of India Limited, Stumpp Schuele & Somappa Limited, the Electronics Division, Division, The Springs Division, the Electronics Division, the Electronics Division, Capacitors, Locus Ignition, Luminaries 4, the Electronics Division, Union, the Electronics Division, the Springs Division, the Electronics Division, Stumpp, Schuele and Somappa Ltd., (Electronics Division, Management, Nippon Electronics, Stumpp Schuele & Somappa Ltd., Nippon Electronics, Somappa Ltd., Somappa Ltd., Nippon Electronics, Somappa Ltd., Nippon Electronics, Somappa Ltd., Nippon Electronics, Somappa Ltd., the Electronics Industry, Division, Union, the State Government, Somappa Ltd., (Electronics Division, SWL, Somappa Ltd., (Electronics Division, Electronics Division, Nippon Electronics, Nippon Electronics, Nippon Electronics, the Nippon Electronics, Nippon Electronics, Stumpp, Schuele & Somappa, the Electronics Division, Nippon Electronics, Stumpp, Schuele & Somappa, Nippon Electronics, the Supreme Court, Indian Leaf Tobacco Development Co. Ltd., Straw Board, the Electronics Division, the State Government, State, The Supreme Court of India, Parliament, Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, the Supreme Court, S. 25-O, Springs, the Supreme Court, Straw Board Manufacturing Co., The State Government, the State Government, The Union of India, Arts, S. 25-O, the Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Parliament, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, General Labour Union, the Union of India, the State of Respondent 3, the Supreme Court, S. 25FFA, the Industrial Dispute, S. 25N, the Supreme Court, Government, the State Government, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, S. 25, the Supreme Court, Section, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, M/s. Hatisingh, Union of India, the Supreme Court, Court, the Labour Unions, The Supreme Court, Apar Private Ltd., Government, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, S. 25-O, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Pipraich Sugar Mills Ltd., Pipraich Sugar Mills Mazdoor Union, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, Government, State, State, Government, Government, Tribunal, Government, Government, Government, Government, the Supreme Court, Government, The Supreme Court, Government, the Supreme Court, the Control Order, State, Government, Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Government, Tribunal, Government, Government, the Supreme Court, Government, the State Government, Court, the State Government, Karnataka Relief Undertakings, Government, Advocate General, Court, Court, Government, Government, Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, National Textile Workers' Union, the Company Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, National Textile Workers' Union, the Supreme Court, the Company Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Legislature, S. 25-O of the Act, Government, The Supreme Court, State, State, the Supreme Court, Workmen v. Straw Board Manufacturing Co., State, the State of the, Government, the Supreme Court

DATE: 1947, 1976, S. 25(O, 1978, 19th December, 1969, spring, the spring factory, the year 1981, 31st December, 1981, 31st December, 1981, 6th June, 1984, July 1981, 1981-82, lakhs1982-83, the five months, January to May 1985, 1st August, 1985, S. 25(O, 30th April, 1985, 1947, 14 of 1947, 30th April, 1985, 1947, 14 of 1947, August, 1985, 1947, 14 of 1947, November 1981, 6th June, 1984, 31st December, 1981, July 1981, 1981-82, 1982-83, 1983-84, 18 months Rs. 65, '1, 30th April, 1985, 17th April, 1985, the years 1981 to 1984, 31st December, 1981, the relevant years, 1981, 1985, 27th June, 1985, 1st August, 1985, 2nd May, 1985, 1947, August, 1985, 27th June, 1985, 18th June, 1985, annual, 1983-84, 1982, the year 1982, 21, 300A, 1 2, ninety days, 1976, sixth days, fifteen days, sixty days, one year two months, two months, thirty days, one year, fifteen day's, six months, only one year, one month, year, year, 1972, year, year, '29, 1961, '30, 1957, a month, one year, one year, 1978]2SCR272, '25, S. 25(O, year, one year, the last three consecutive years, the three years, the years Inspite, 1983, 1981, 1977, 16th April, 1985, several years, day, 1983, Para 6, 1983, just fifteen days', fifteen days', 15 days', 15 days', '25, 25, 26, 30, 1974

PERSON: Art, S. 25-O, Art, Bangalore, Sd/- M. R. Ramesh, Tota, Motor Run, Stump Schuele, Stumpp Schuele, Stumpp Schuele, Stumpp Schuele, Stumpp Schuele, Bangalore, Stumpp Schuele, Somappa, Somappa, Art, Art, Excel Wear - (, Art, S. 25-O, S. 25-O, Art, B. V. Chavan, S. 25-O, Art, Art, Art, Art, Art, S. 25(O, S. 25-O25, Excel Wear, Acme, S. 25(O, Reasons, Nadkarni, Frankfurter J., Benjamin Cardozo, U. Unichoyi v. State, Law, Art, S. 25-O, Bina Pani Dei, A. K. Kraipak v. Union, Mohinder Singh Gill v. Election, S. 25-O, S. 25-O, Prasad v. State of, Order, Coal Controller, Umrigar, Art, Art, Gowribidanur Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane, S. 25-O, P. R. Ramakrishnan, Art, Bill, Excel Wear, Art, Excel Wear, Art, Art

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India, Export Award, Schuele and Somappa, 'Excel Wear', Government and Liberty', Paradoxes of Legal Science', the Constitution of India'

ORDINAL: first, second, first, 1st, first, 1st, first, first, third, secondly, 4th, first

GPE: Building, Karnataka, Karnataka, Workmen, Guntur, Workmen, Art, Art, Art, Workmen, Art, Art, Art, Art, Art, Art, Art, India, Art, Hatisingh, Unichoyi, Kerala, Kerala, Art, Art, Art, Orissa, Art, Art, Art, Art, Art

PERCENT: 35%, 8 to 12%, 3 - Union

TIME: 11.00 a.m.

PRODUCT: Excel Wear's, Excel Wear's, Excel Wear's, Excel Wear, Excel Wear

QUANTITY: 8 kilometers

NORP: contra

MONEY: 1960-II, 1978-II

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //