Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Khaitan Minerals Vs. Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal for Mysore at Bangalore

Decided On : Jan-30-1962

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Article 286 of the Indian Constitution, section 27, Article 286, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(2, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286, Article have been, Article 286(1)(a, Constitution, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(2, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286, Constitution, Article 286, Constitution, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(1)(a, Constitution, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(1, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(2, Article 286(1, Article 286(2, Constitution, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(2, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(1)(b, Constitution, Article 286(1)(b, a Constitution Bench, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(2, Constitution, the Constitution (Sixth Amendment) Act, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(1)(a, Act (Act VII of

ORG: ORDERHegde, C.R.P. No, the Commercial Tax Officer, the Mysore Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Mysore Sales Tax Act, Court, the Mysore State, the State of Mysore, Messrs Essen & Co., Mysore State, F.O.R. Vizagapatnam Port, the Mysore Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mysore State, the Mysore Sales Tax Act, State, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the State of Mysore, State, the Supreme Court, State, State, the Supreme Court, State of Bombay & Another, United Motors, India) Ltd. & Others, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, the United Motors, Explanation, State, State, State, State, State, Explanation, State, the United Motors, Explanation, State, State, Explanation, State, State, Explanation, Bench, Bengal Immunity Co., Ltd., State of Bihar and Others, State, Explanation, Explanation, Explanation, State, State, the United Motors, the Bengal Immunity Co.'s, the Bengal Immunity Co.'s, the Sale of Goods Act, Capco Ltd., Sales Tax Officer, Mysore High Court, Sales Tax, Explanation, the Mysore State, the Mysore Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the State of Mysore, State, the Mysore State, Burmah Shell Oil Storage, Distributing Co., India Ltd., Standard Vacuum Oil Co., Commercial Tax, the Supreme Court, State, State, State, Explanation, State, State, the Supreme Court, India Copper Corporation Ltd., The State of Bihar and Others, State, State, Explanation, State, State, Explanation, State, State, State, State, State, State, the Mysore Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, State, Travancore-Cochin and Others v., Bombay Company Limited, S.C. 366, The Supreme Court, Court, State, the Sales Tax Authorities, State, Travancore-Cochin and Others v., the Supreme Court, State, Court, State, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, Ram Narain Sons Ltd., Sales Tax and Others, Berar Sales Tax Act, Madhya Pradesh, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, State, Gurviah Naidu & Co., Ltd., Court, Court, Travancore-Cochin v. Bombay Co. Ltd., S.C. 366, State, Court, Travancore-Cochin v., the Supreme Court, Another v. Mysore Spinning, Court, the Supreme Court, Calcutta, Court, the Supreme Court, the Burmah Shell Oil Storage, Distributing Co.'s, Lordships, Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., The Stale of Andhra Pradesh, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, State, State, Indian Coffee Board, Ashok Leyland Ltd., The Coffee Board, The State of Mysore, State, State, State, State, Explanation, State, State, Explanation, Parliament, the Supreme Court, Sundararamier & Co., The State of Andhra Pradesh, C.R.P., C.R.P. No, The Mysore Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Mysore Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, C.R.P. No, Court, the Mysore Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, C.R.P. No, the Mysore Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal

NORP: J.1, manganese, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State

CARDINAL: one, 864, 2, 165, 3., 4., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), 9, 5, 6., 1953]4SCR1069, 8, 9, 10., two, one, 1953]4SCR1069, 1953]4SCR1069, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1955]2SCR603, four, 54, 11, 2, 3, 12, 13, 2, 2, 14, 1953]4SCR1069, 1955]2SCR603, 1955]2SCR603, 8, 248, 14, 15, 1961]1SCR902, more than one, 16, 12, 56, 347, 1, 17, 18, 19, 20, 1952, 3, 434, 10, two, 22, 23, 1954]1SCR53, 1, 2, 3, 25, 1955]2SCR483, 26, 1956CriLJ331, 1952, 3, 434, 1954]1SCR53, 27, 28, 29, 1961]1SCR902, 30, 12, 765, 7, 135, 8, 210, 877, 879, 32, 1, 2, 3, more than one, 4, 5, 6, 7, 33, one, 34, 853, 854, 864, 35, 853, 854, 37., 864, one, 864, 38, 40

ORDINAL: first, first, fourth, first

DATE: 1959, 1958, 1956, monthly, 1956, 1)(a, 1)(a, 1)(a, 1930, 1930, 1957, 1961, 1961, 1956, ' 21, 1952, ' 24, 1947, 1949, 12th September, 1949, the period 1st, October, 1949, September, 1950, 1952, 1961, 1956, 31, 1956, 1957, 1960, 1956, September, 1955, 1508, 1960, 1959, 36, 1508, 1960, 1959, 1959

GPE: Sandur, States, States, States, States, States, States, Judges, A.I.R., Mys, S.C., States, States, India, A.I.R., India, India, India, America, Amravati, Madhya Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Salem, A.I.R., Gordhandas Lalji, West Bengal, Bombay, West Bengal, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, India, Bombay, States

LOC: Bellary District, Madras

PRODUCT: Bellary, Mir Iqbal Husain

PERSON: Bangalore, Bangalore, Venkatarama Aiyar, J., Bangalore, Venkatarama Aiyar, J., Shanmugha Vilas Cashew-nut, Quilon, Madras, Shanmugha Vilas Cashew-nut, Vivian Bose, J., Bench, v. B. Banerjee, S. Ghosh, Batlagundu, Ennore, Bangalore, Pleader, Sri Chabriah, Pleader, Sri D. M. Chandrasekhar, Government Pleader, Sri E. S. Venkataramiah, Pleader, Sri E. S. Venkataramiah

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //