Santosh Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Decided On : Sep-29-1988

Court : Karnataka

LAW: section 32, Section 43(3, section 279(1, the English Act, section 10(5, section 10(5

PERSON: S.A. Hakeem, Bangalore Bench, Schofield, Sri Prasad, Sri K. Srinivasan, Holmes, Tamil Nadu, Lindley L.J., Lindley L.J., Jarrold, John Good, Reid, Guest

NORP: J.1

MONEY: 256(1

DATE: 1961, years 1975-76, 1976-77, 1970, 1974, 1978, 1979, 1977]1SCR950, 1960, three years, 1962, 1970, 62

ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Revenue, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Act, the Supreme Court, IRC, Curle and Co. Ltd., ITR, H. Hall Ltd., CIT, Kanodia Cold Storage, Benson v. Yard Arm Club Ltd., the Chancery Division, Legislature, Manickam, Co., CA, Scientific Engineering House P. Ltd., CIT, the Supreme Court, Ireland Ltd., ITR, CIT, Taj Mahal Hotel, Sons Ltd., IRC, Curle and Co. Ltd., ITR, the House of Lords, CIT, Taj Mahal Hotel, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3., 4., 5., 6., 76, 62, 49, 8, 1975]100ITR155(All, 9, 785, 10, 11, 1887, 19, 647, 658, 12, 1986]157ITR86(SC, 39, 357, 1971]82ITR44(SC, one, 1887, 19, 647, 40, 681, 13, 76, 67, 14, 76, 75, 15, 16, 1971]82ITR44(SC, 17, 18, 19

ORDINAL: first, first, second

WORK_OF_ART: 2 All ER 958,968

GPE: Yarmouth, France, Hinton, Maden, Yarmouth, France

EVENT: the 1922 Act, the 1961 Act