Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

S.N. Hada and ors. Vs. the Binny Ltd. Staff Association

Decided On : Nov-19-1987

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 34, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 34, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 34, Section 34(1, Section 9, Section 34(1, Section 34(1, Section 39, Section 39, Section 39, Section 34, Section 39, Section 39 of the Act, Section 34(1, Section 29, Section 39 of the Act, Section 34 of the Act, Section 34 of the Act, Section 39, Section 34 of the Act, Section 34, Section 39, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34 of the Act, Section 39, Section 34, Section 39, Section 39, Section 34 of the Act, Section 34, Section 34, Section 25, Section 25-M or Section 25-N. Sections, Section 25-O. Section 25, Section 26 penalty, Section 26, Section 27, Section 28, Section 29, Section 30, Section 21, Section 30, Section 31(1, Section 33, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 30, Section 21, Section 34, Section 30, Section 196, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 34, the Industrial Disputes Act

PERSON: Prem Chand Jain, S. N. Hada, Cotton, Bangalore, Bench Judgment, Allampolli Venkataram, Pundarika Aithal's, Jayashankar, Pundarika Aithal's, R. N. Narasimha Murthy, Counsel, Sri Rajendra Babu, Sri K. Subba Rao, Pundarika Aithal's, Mary C. Nidhiri Chacko, M. S. Rama Rao v. V. Jayashankar & Others, M. S. Rama Rao, Bangalore, Nesargi, Sri Narasimha Murthy, Mary C. Nidhiri Chacko, Counsel, Sri Narasimha Murthy, Counsel, v. S. A. Jabbar, Kumar Kar, William Trevelyan Cartis Parker

ORG: Labour, Labour, IAA, Labour, the Binny Mills Staff Association, Silk Mills Co., Ltd., Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, State, Counsel for the State, Court, Bench, Bench, the State Government, State, State, State, the State Government, Government, Court, Government, Government, Labour, the State Government, Labour, Government, the State Government, Labour, the State Government, The Learned Judge, the Judgment of the Kerala High Court, State, the State Government, Labour, Section, the Revision Petition, the Bangalore District Engineering Worker's Union, the Court of the J.M.F.C., Magistrate, the State Government, the Learned Magistrate, Court, Government, Sections 34, the High Court, Court, K. Pundarika Aithal v., Allampolli Venkataraman &, Magistrate, Government, Court, Court, Section, Sections, Magistrate, Employer, Employer, Tribunal, Employer, Legislature, Government, Employer, Government, the State Government, the State Government, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Court, Government, Legislature, Government, Government, Complaint, Court

CARDINAL: 2, 1, 2, 3., 5, 528/1973, 6, 8, two, 571, two, 9, 528/73, one, one, 39, two, 10, 11, two, 12, 25R, 1, 2, 2, 13, two, 14, one thousand, 15, 16

ORDINAL: 11th, third, first, first, second, secondly

DATE: May 1982, 8th of December 1980, '34, 85. 4, 22nd July 1974, 22nd July 1974, six months

NORP: K.

PRODUCT: a Full Bench

GPE: Counsel, Kerala, Counsel, Kerala, State, Kerala, Counsel, Counsel, Employee, Employee, Employee, Employee

MONEY: 1961-II-LLJ-569, 1966-II-LLJ-888

WORK_OF_ART: 'The Section, Judgment in Criminal Appeal No

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //