Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kittamma and anr. Vs. B. Subba Rai and anr.

Decided On : Aug-04-1958

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 151, Order 39 Rules 1, Rule 2, Order 39, the Civil Procedure Code, the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 39, the Rent Control Act, the Rent Control Act, Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Rule 2, Section 12(4, the Rent Control Act, Rule 1 or Rule 2, Rule 1, the Rent Control Act, the Rent Control Act, the Rent Control Act, the Rent Control Act

ORG: ORDERA, Original Suit, the Court of the District Munsiff of Mangalore, the Court of the District Judge, Court, H.R.C.O.P, the Court of the RentController, the Madras Buildings,, Doomappa, Doomappa, Controller, the Principal Subordinate, Controller, Controller, the District Court of South Kanara, Civil Revision Petition, the High Court, this High Court, Court, stated:'It, O.S. No, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Bench, the Rent Control Act, Act, Counsel, Mysore High Court, Gururajachar, House, the Mysore House Rent Control Order, the High Court of Travancore Cochin, AIR 1952, Trav-Co 125.In, the High Court, Controller, Controller, Mysore High Courts, AIR 1949, Thimmayya, AIR 1952, Court, this High Court, Controller, Doomappa, Court, the Patna High Court, Firm Ram, Court, Court, the Court of the District Munsiff of Mangalore, Court, Court of South Kanara.15

PERSON: Narayana Pai, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and2, Mangalore, R. S. No, Subba Rai, Subba Rai, Subba Rai, Subba Rai, Subba Rai, Mangalore, Subba Rai, Subba Rai's, Somnath Iyer, J.,on, Controller, C. R. P., Jitlal Singh, Kamaleswari Prosad, Mukherji, J., Order XXXIX, Order XXXIX, Rangiah, Venkataramana Rao, Chinnakannu Pillai, Ammalu Amma, Order XXXIX, Somnath Iyer J., Subba Rai, Order XXXIX, Kishun Shah

GPE: South Kanara, South Kanara, Issue, Mangalore, Doomappa, South Kanara, Sadasivappa, C.M.A.

WORK_OF_ART: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 11/1953, Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No, 1949 Mad 104

CARDINAL: 22-4, 14, 12, 1, 2, 3, 191, one, 535, 225, 8/-.The, two, 22-4, 119/-, as many as nine, 11, 22, 22-4, 41/1956, 22-4, one, 41, one, 18, 2, 2, 52, 76, 41, one, one, two, 6, 2, one, 14, 11

DATE: 1936, the 1st, 1954, the 1st Respondent, monthly, the 1st, the 1st, September 1946, the 1st, 1956, this order.7, monthly, 1922, proceedings.11, 1958, 1955

EVENT: the Civil Procedure Code

ORDINAL: 2nd, 2nd, second, first, first, first, first

NORP: Thota, Subramanian, C. R.

LOC: Madras, Madras, Revision

FAC: the District Munsiff's

PRODUCT: Rule 2

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //