Semantic Analysis by spaCy
M. Parmanand and anr. Vs. Additional Income-tax Officer, Bangalore
Decided On : Nov-06-1957
Court : Karnataka
LAW: Section 23, Section 35, the Income Tax Act, Section 19, Section 35, the Indian Income Tax Act, Section 33-A, Section 19, Section 35, Section 31, Section 33, Section 33-A, Section 33-B, Section 66 or, Section 66-A, Section 19, Section 35, the Amending Act, Section 35, Section 10, the Income Tax Act, Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, Constitution
ORG: S.R. Das Gupta, Chandiram Brothers', the Indian Income Tax Act, the Indian Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Officer, the Supreme Court, Income Tax, Isthmian Steamship Lines, High Courts, Bombay Dyeing, the Bombay High Court, the Madras High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Lakshminarayana Chetty v., AIR 1957, Income Tax Officer's, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Petitioners, Petitioners, the Supreme Court, follows:'It, Lordship, Emphasis, the Supreme Court, Petitioners, Advocate
CARDINAL: only one, two, 134, 135, 31-3-1954, 3, 23-8-1955, 4, 5, 1, 4, two-fold, 1957]32ITR369(Mad, 2, two, one, 1955CriLJ374, 14, two, two, 14, two
DATE: 55, 55, 30-12-1954, the assessment year 1950-51, 29th March 1955, 93,461/-, 1953, four years, four years, 1953, 1st April 1952, four years, 1st April 1952, April 1952, the assessment year, 1950, 1st April 1952, April, 1952, the Assessment year, the year, the year of assessment.7, the end of the year 1938-39, the subsequent year, 1939-40, 1922, the assessment year, the year, the year, April 1952, the same year, April 1952, 1st April, 1952
PERSON: W. P. No., Bangalore, namely:--, M. K. Venkatachalam, S. K. Habibullah, Budhan Choudhry v. State of, S. R. Das, Art
LOC: Silk
ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, second, second, first, second, second
GPE: Commr, West Bengal, Bihar, Art, Iyer, J.12
FAC: Lordship