Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

N. Kenchappa Vs. Sales Tax Officer, Iv Circle, Aliaskar Road, Bangalore

Decided On : Sep-12-1956

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, The Sales Tax Act, Constitution, the Mysore Act, Act 18 of 1940, Section 24, Section 29, Section 36, the Sales Tax Act, Article 286, Constitution, Article 372, Article 14, Constitution, Constitutional, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Rule 1, Article 14, Rule 1, Article 14.11

PERSON: Venkataramaiya, Gannan Dunkerley, Subject, Bradley J., Greene, Stewart Dry Goods Co., Lewis, Anvar Ali Sarkar, Ellis, inversely.10

DATE: C.J. 1, 1955, 1956 Hyd 79, 1935, 1890, each year, 1952, 24-12-1955, 1910, 1935, 1897, 1931

ORG: the Mysore Sales Tax Act, Nagpur High Court, the Hyderabad High Court, Jubilee Engineering Co. Ltd., Sales Tax Officer, Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Court, the Madras High Court, the Government of India Act, the Supreme Court, the Mysore Sales Tax Act, Hyderabad, Central Provinces, the Government of India Act, Government of India Act, State, the Government of Mysore Act, Assembly, the Government of Mysore Act.5, Works Contract, the State Legislation, Bell, Gap Railroad Company v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, US 232, State, State, State Legislature, State, Governments, Works Contract, the State of Mysore, State, Southern Railway Co., State, Government, Special Courts, Justice Brewer, Cumberland Coal Co. v., Board of Revision, Advocate General

CARDINAL: one, two, 48, one, 13-4-1940, 134, 1, 1, 2, 11-4-1952, one, Only three, three, one, 216, 294, 562, 1952CriLJ510, 165, 165, 284, 29, two

ORDINAL: third, 14th, first

LOC: Madras

GPE: Maharaja, US, US, Gulf of Colorado & Santafe Rly, US, US

MONEY: 20 per cent, 30 per cent, 33.1/3 per cent, 30 per cent, 75 per cent

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //