Semantic Analysis by spaCy
A.T. Parthasarathiah and Bros. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Mysore
Decided On : Mar-01-1962
Court : Karnataka
LAW: section 66(1, section 2(1)(b)(ii, section 4(3)(viii, section 2(1)(b)(ii, section 2(1)(b)(ii, Section 2(1)(b)(ii, section 2(1)(b)(ii, section 2(1)(b)(ii, section 2(1)(b)(ii, section 2(1)(b)(ii, section 2(1)(b)(ii, section 2(1)(b)(ii, section 2(1)(b)(ii, section 2(1)(b)(ii
CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, two, 1, one, 2, 4., 5, one, 6, 26, 8, one, 9, 10, 1,010, one, one, 12, 13, 17, 18, two, 14, 15, 16, 17
NORP: Indian, Indian
GPE: assessee, Sheolal, Pandharkooda, Bombay
ORG: Tribunal, Tribunal, Killing Valley Tea Co. Ltd., State, A. C.J., the Patna High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Killing Valley Tea Co. Ltd., State, the High Court, the High Court, Brihan Maharashtra Sugar Syndicate Ltd., Bench, Lordship, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal
PRODUCT: the 'Act', the 'Act'
ORDINAL: first, second, eleventh, first, first, first, first
PERSON: Mookerjee, bush, John McEwan, Britannica, Lieut, Col E. Money, David Crole, J. M. Casey v. Commissioner of Income-tax, bush, Ramlal, Kania J., Kania J.
DATE: the end of July, 1962