Skip to content

New Krishna Bhavan Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, No. Iv Circle (Addl.) Bangalore - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Dec-02-1959

Court: Karnataka

LAW: Section 3, Section 3, Act 25, Article 14 of the Constitution, After, Section 3 of the Act, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 3, Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Article 13(1, Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Article, Constitution, Article 13, Constitution, Article 19, Article 13, Constitution, Article 13(1, Constitution, Article 13(3, Constitution, Constitution, Section 22, the Madras Act, Constitution, pre-Constitution Act, Section 22, the Madras Act, Article 286 of the Constitution and, Constitution, Article 141 of the Constitution, Section 3(1)(a, Constitution

ORG: S.R. Das Gupta, the Partners of Hotel New Krishna Bhawan, the Commercial Tax Officer, the High Court of Mysore, and(b, Dealer, the High Court of Mysore, the Mysore Sales Tax Act, the Supreme Court, Sundararamier, Co., State of Andhra Pradesh, Hotel Keepers, the Mysore Sales Tax Act, the Mysore Sales Tax Act, Mysore High Court, the Hotel Keepers, Clauses, Statute, Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, State of U. P., the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Lordships, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Government Pleader, Lordships, Lordships, the Supreme Court, Das, Lordships, follows:'The, Das, Court, Legislature, the Supremo Court, the Supreme Court, I., Court, Das, the Judges of the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Lordships, the Adaptation Order, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Court, Legislature, the American Courts, Legislature, Lordship, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Judges of, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Mysore Sales Tax Act

PERSON: Malleswaram Bangalore, Rate, Item, Therate, Item, Item, Item, T. Krishna Rao, Bhikaji Narain v. State of M. P., T. Krishna Rao, Hotel Keepers, T. Krishna Rao, Pleader, Pleader, Krishna Rao, Pleader, Law, Section R. Das, Venkatarama Ayyar, J., T. Krishna Rao, Lordships, J., Behrarn Khurshid Pesikaka v. State, Pleader, Pleader, Suhba Rao, S. R. Das, J., Subba Rao, J., Venkatarama Ayyar, J., Subba Rao, J., T. Krishna Rao, T. Krishna Rao, T. Krishna Rao, T. Krishna Rao, T. Krishna Rao fails.12, Pleader, A.R. Somnath Iyer, J.14

CARDINAL: 23-4-1958, 1, 1, 7,500, 10,000 Rs, 25/-per, 2, 10,000, 25,000, 1, 10.000, two, 10.000, 3, 25,000, 2, 25,000, three, 25,000, 7,500, 10.000Rs. 73, 10,000, 36,000The, 1, 10.000, 36,000The, 2, 36,000, four, 36,000, 1, two, two, 1, two, two, 6, 18-6-1951, 6, 6, 6, 6, 18-6-1951, 2, 6, two, two, two, 1, 1951CriLJ680, 1955CriLJ215, one, 1955CriLJ215, one, 1955]2SCR589, two, 1955]2SCR589, two, two, one, two, one

DATE: the year 1956-57, 1948, 1954, 27-9-1956, 1948, 1954, each year, such year, 1951

PRODUCT: Amending Act 25, Amending Act 18 of 1957

GPE: theturnover, theturnover, Deep Chand, Keshavan, Bombay, Bombay, Pesikaka, India, India, Judges

FAC: the Hotel Keepers, the Hotel Keepers

TIME: 26-1-1950

EVENT: pre-Constitution, post-Constitution

ORDINAL: firstly, secondly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //