Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

S. Rama Rao Vs. Dasarathy Rao and ors.

Decided On : Mar-23-1954

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Defendant 1, Section 27, Section 27, Section 27, Section 2, Factories Act, the Factors Act 1842

CARDINAL: 1, 2, two, 2, 3, 2, 1, 3, three, 2, 1, 2, 3, two, 14, 1, 2, two, 2, 3, 8, 1, 2, 2, 3., 1, 2, 2, 4, 1, 3, 22, 29, 1, 2, 1, 5., 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 6, 13, one, 228, 47, 571, 15, 2, 2, 3, two, 50/-thus, 2, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 8, 2, 9, 2, 2, 10

EVENT: Exhibits II

ORG: Sri Krishnarajendra Mills Ltd., the Indian Bank Ltd., Branch Office, the Indian Bank, Court, Oppenheimer v. Attenborough & Son', business, & in, London Joint Stock Bank, A.C. 333, London Joint Stock Bank, A.C. 201, Bank, Company, AIR 1922 Bom 303, Colonial Bank, AIR

PERSON: Dasarathy Rao, Dasarathy Rao, Dasarathy Rao, Ramamurthy, Exs, Ex, Exs, Buckley L. J, Kennedy L. J. and Lord, Alverstone C. J., Broker, Alverstone C. J., Buckley L. J. states, Allana, Mangaldas, C S. Rao, Ex, Singh v., Gumani Raut', Pat 300, defendant2

QUANTITY: 2-2-1947

DATE: a week, a week, 1908, 1888, 1893, 1889, 1908, 1890, the 1st

PRODUCT: Bench

TIME: business hours

LANGUAGE: English

GPE: Sheffield, --'Ramdeni

NORP: D.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //