Semantic Analysis by spaCy
R. Hanumanthappa and Son Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Decided On : Jan-04-1967
Court : Karnataka
LAW: section 66(2, section 34, section 25, section 25A, section 25(3, section 66, section 25(3, the Mysore Act, the Indian Act, the Mysore Act of 1923, section 25, the Mysore Act of, the Indian Act, section 25, section 25(3, the Contract Act, section 26(2, section 26(2, section 25(3, section 25(3
PERSON: Narayana Pai, R. Hanumanthappa, Ramasetty, Sreenivasa Murthy, Deepavali, Deepavali, Gopamma, Sri R. Hanumanthappa Sri Rama Sri R. R. Srini-Setty, vasa Murthy-----------------------------------------------------------------Rs, Gopamma, N. N. Firm, S. N. A. S. A. Annamalai, Annamalai, Satyanarayana Rao J., Raghava Rao J. 19, Rama Rao Sahib, Polson, K. H. Chambers, Subba Rao J., N. N. Firm, Rowlatt J.
NORP: J.1, Hindu, Indian, Indian, Hindu, Hindu, Indian
ORG: the Mysore Income-tax Act, Hanumanthappa & Son', the Mysore Income-tax Act, the Mysore Income-tax Act, State of Mysore, the High Courts, the Privy Council, the Indian High Courts, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, the Rangoon High Court, Page C.J., Lordship, the Madras High Court, Privy Council, Polson, the Supreme Court, Page C.J., Ogston, Reynolds Sons & Co. Ltd., the Mysore Income-tax Act
DATE: 1923, November 30, 1947, November 1, 1948, December 29, 1949, some years later, 1923, 2nd November, 1948, 1922, '25, 1920, the previous year, the previous year, the previous year, 1920, 1918, that year, 1922, the previous year, the same year, 1920, 1939, '24
CARDINAL: one, 2, 3, 3, One, three, one, three, 75,000, 10,068, 64,231, 59,876, 81,382, 5., 6., 2, 8, 3, 9, 3, 10, 11, 12, 4, 3, 13, 14, 15, one, one, 16, 17, two, one, 18, 3, 20, 21, 22, 23, 250
ORDINAL: first
MONEY: 3,229 3,229 3,229Land 25,000 15,000
QUANTITY: 1,00,000 1,10,000Machinery 3,50,000
PERCENT: 47,526 47,526 47,526Book balance(Debtors
LOC: British India
GPE: India, Mysore
FAC: Rangoon
PRODUCT: Chettiar v. Commissioner of Income-tax