Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

K. Subbaraya and anr. Vs. Government of Mysore

Decided On : Feb-21-1951

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Clause 5, Section 106, the Explosive Substances Act, Section 106, Section 106, Section 106, Section 106

ORG: ORDER1, Clauses 3, Movement of Timber (Control) Order, Clause 5 &, Clauses 3 & 5, Order, the D. F. O., reside &, the Clause &, Cts, AIR, AIR, petnr, AIR, section &, the hospital Committee, the Control Order, Clause, the Silk Control Order, Advocate-General, AIR, &, AIR, the accused & can, Control Order, P.W. 4

CARDINAL: two, 200/-, 50/-, 5, 19, 437, 28, 15, 31, 339, 2, 3, 2, 368, two, 23, 169, 23, 289, two

PERSON: Sagar, Ram Charan v. Emperor', Jay Mahto, Lal, Santa Singh', facie, facie, Stephen v. The King', Order

DATE: 1948, 30-10-1649, 30-10-1949, 30-10-1949, 20) 1933, 1944, 30-10-1949, more than a year, the 30th, that very day, '50, the 30th, 1936, 1936, the day, 29-10-50 &, the 1st

NORP: Soppinabetta, Atygalle, D.

ORDINAL: 3rd, 2nd, 3rd, 3rd, 29th, 30th

TIME: twenty-four hours, more than 24 hours, more than 24 hours, 24 hours, more than 24 hours

PERCENT: 166.51 C. Ft.

MONEY: 3 & 4, 3 & 4

GPE: Counsel

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //