Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Cit Vs. Smt. A.S. Rukmani Ammal

Decided On : Nov-25-2002

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 168, the Income Tax Act, section 64(1)(iii, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, section 64(1)(iii, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, section 143(1)(a, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, section 64, the Income Tax Act, section 64, the Income Tax Act, section 64(1)(iii, the Income Tax Act.8, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, section 64, the Income Tax Act, section 34, the Income Tax Act, Chapter V of the Income Tax Act, section 64, the Income Tax Act, Chapter V of the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, section 64, the Income Tax Act, section 271, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, section 143(1)(a, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, section 143(1)(a, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, section 64, the Income Tax Act, section 168(1, the Income Tax Act, section 64, the Income Tax Act, section 64, the Income Tax Act, section 64, the Income Tax Act

PERSON: N.V. Balasubramanian, Savadappan Gounder, A.S. Rukmani Ammal, Savadappan Gounder, A. Savadappan, A. Savadappan Gounder, Savadappan Gounder, A. Savadappan, Pushya Sitharaman, R. Janakiraman, Hemchandra Kar, Ltd.s, N. Ramakrishnan, N. Ramakrishnan's, Gordon Woodroffe's, Ltd.s, P.K. Kochammu Amma Peroke, P.K. Kochammu Amma

CARDINAL: two, 7,500, two, Two, two, 2000]244ITR620(Mad, one, 30-4-1998, two, two, 6, two, 1970]77ITR1(SC, five, 1,10,000, five, five, five, 1981]130ITR1(SC, 1986]160ITR625(Mad, 1964]51ITR12(Mad, hundreds, one, 2, 2, 9, 1980]125ITR624(SC, 1)(c, one, One

ORG: Sowdeswari, Ganesan, Estate, Estate, The Appellate Tribunal, Estate, Estate, the Appellate Tribunal, CIT, the Appellate Tribunal, Estate, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Income Tax Officer, Estate, the Appellate Tribunal, Estate, Estate, Estate, the Supreme Court, CIT, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Appellate, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Income Tax, the Supreme Court, Ganga Saran & Sons, ITO, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Ganga Saran & Sons, CIT, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Gordon Woodroffe & Co. Ltd., ITO, The Supreme Court, CIT, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Peroke, The Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Estate, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal

GPE: A.S., A.S., Savadappan, London, question.14, Smt

DATE: 1976-77, 1961, 1976-77, years, years, years, few days, a few days later, all the assessment years, years, years, 1972, the assessment years

ORDINAL: firstly, secondly, first, second, third, first

NORP: Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Indian, A. Savadappans

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //