Geeta Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State and anr.

Decided On : Sep-22-2008

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 145(2, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, Section 145, Section 138, Section 145, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 145(2, Section 482, Section 138, Section 141, Chapter VI, Chapter VI, Section 145(2, Section 145(2, Section 138, Chapter VI, Section 145(2, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 145, Section 145, the Division Bench, the Division Bench, Section 138, Section 145, Section 145, Section 145, Section 294, Section 294, Section 294, Section 294 of the Code, Section 294, Section 294, Section 294, Section 36, the Indian Stamp Act, the Evidence Act, Section 35, Section 36, the Stamp Act, the Bombay Stamp Act, Section 35, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 227(2)(b, Chapter VI, the Evidence Act, the Stamp Act, Section 138, Section 145, the Evidence Act, Chapter 6, the Chapter 6

PERSON: ORDERAbhay S. Oka, Act.5, Anr, Marwadi, Shri J.P. Cama, Anr, Venkatachala Gounder, Arulmigu Viswesaraswami, V.P. Temple, Anr, Omprakash Shiopraksh, Anr, AIR1973Bom40 .9, Anr, Anr, Anr, Anr, Anr, Anr, Pramod K. Shah v. Commissioner, Anr, Madras, Creative Enterprises, Hussainsab v. State, Ganpat Raoji's, Paragraphs 12 to, Anr, Pukhraj Surana, Exhibits P. 1, Yelamarti Satyam Alias Satteyya, Narbada Devi Gupta v., Anr, Bama Kathari Patil v. Rohidas Arjun Madhavi, Anr, Anr, Anr

NORP: J.1, Rules, Rules, Maharashtra

CARDINAL: 331, 2, 2, 738, 33, 33, 738, 2008.8, 2001CriLJ1254, 33 to 35, at least two, 2, 38, 1, 1, 2, 729, 11, 11, 2, 1, 2, 5, 716, 475, 3, 1, 345, 7, 3, 3, 15, thus:12, two, 20, two, two, two, two, One, one, five, 1962]2SCR333, 19, 33, 34, 1, 2, 33, 34, 34, 16, 2004(3)BomCR509, three, 12, 13, 14, 41, 10, one, 331, 2, 79, 33, 33, 33, 1, 738

DATE: 2008, 27th December, 2007, 1881, 1170 of 2008, 1171, 2008, 1172, 2008, 30th May, 2008, 2008, 1881, 2008, 1973, August, 2008, August, 2008, 2008, 1170 of 2008, 1171, 2008, 1172, 2006, 2233, 1881, 1881, 2005, 2006, 1881, 2007, 1335, 2007, 1973, 1981, 1983, 18, 1973, 1973, 1966]3SCR283, 1958, the year 1960, 1973, 20th June, 1982, 16th August, 1982, 04th October, 2005, 1170, 1171, 2008, August, 2008, 16th July, 2008, August, 2008, 16th July, 2008, 16th July, 2008, 16th July, 2008, 1881, 2008

ORG: Metropolitan Magistrate, Court, Criminal Application No, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, KSL, Industries Ltd., Mannalal Khandelwal, Court, Special Leave Petitions, the Apex Court, Court, Magistrate, Magistrates, State, Criminal Writ Petition No, Criminal Application No, the Apex Court, Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of, Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Bipin Panchal, the Apex Court, Court, Sanjay Cotton Co., Criminal Writ Petition Nos, Court, Court, Court, Peacock Industries Ltd., Budhrani Finance Ltd., Court, Bipin Panchal, Reliance, Court, Peacock Industries Ltd., Wipro Finance Ltd., Court, Magistrate, Bipin Panchal, the Apex Court, Bipin Panchal, Court, the Apex Court, Bipin Panchal, Court, Court, KSL Industries Ltd., Court, Court, Indo International Ltd., Court, KSL Industries, KSL Industries, Court, the Division Bench, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Court, Magistrates, the Apex Court, Court, Peacock Industries Ltd., KSL Industries, the Apex Court, Custom Export Promotion, AIR Bom R, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, Courts, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd., Church of South Indian Trust Association, Court, Court, Judicial, the Apex Court, Bipin Panchal, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Roman Catholic Mission v. State of, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Javer Chand and Ors, The Apex Court, The Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, P.2, Court, Court, the Trial Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Registrar, Court, the High Court, Court, Courts, Courts, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Sait Tarajee Khimchand, Ors, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, Birendra Kumar Jaiswal, Reliance, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Court of law, the Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Bipin Panchal, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Court, Peacock Industries, Court, Bipin Panchal, Court, Peacock Industries, Wipro Finance Ltd., Court, the Apex Court, Bipin Panchal, Bipin Panchal, Court, the Apex Court, Bipin Panchal, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Bipin Panchal, Courts, Court, Apex Court, the Apex Court, Court, Peacock Industries, the Apex Court, Bipin Panchal, Magistrate, the Apex Court, Bipin Panchal, Bipin Panchal, Court, document.26, Court, K.S.L. Industries, supra).28, the Criminal Application No, Magistrate, Sections 77, Court, Court, Chapter VI, this Court of Section 145(2

ORDINAL: 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, first, second, First, Second, first, firstly, secondly, first, second, first, second, first, second, third, first, first

PRODUCT: P-17, Cri LJ 487, the Full Bench

GPE: Gujarat, R.V.E. Venkatachala, supplied)14, expenses.15, R.V.E. Venkatachala, Ramji Dayawala, Us, R.V.E. Venkatachala, R.V.E. Venkatachala, evidence.27

LOC: Maharashtra, Madras

TIME: for long hours

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India

FAC: Javer Chand