Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Decided On : Feb-28-2006

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 7-A, Section 7-A, Section 2(f, Section 19-A, Section 2(f, Section 19-A of PF Act, Section 19, Section 7-A, Section 7, Section 2(f, Provident Fund Act, Section 2(f, Section 7-A(2, Section 7-A, Section 19-A., Section 7-A, Section 19-A, the Section 19-A, Section 7-A, Section 2(f, Section 7-A, Section 7-A, Section 7-A, Section 7-A of, Section 7-A., Section 71, Section 7-A, Section 7-A, Section 7-A, Section 19-A, Section 7-A, Section 2(f, Section 7-A, Section 7-A of the Act, Section 7-A of the Act, Section 7-A, Section 7-A, Section 7-A, Section 19-A, Section 7-A of the Act, Section 7-A, Section 7-A Following observations of, Section 19-A of the Act, Section 19, Section 19-A, Section 19, Section 2(f, Section 7-A, Section 7-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 7-A, Section 35, Section 37-B of the Act, Section 37-B of the Act, the Revenue Officers, Section 37-B, Section 3 7-B of the Act, Section 37-B of the Act, Section 7-A, Section 19-A, Section 7-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 1:(iii, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A Considering, Section 19-A, Section 2(f, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 7-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, the P.F. Act, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 7-A, Section 19, Section 19-A, Section 7-A, Section 19-A, the P.F. Act, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 33, Section 33, the Delhi Laws Act, Section 33, Section 19-A, Section 8 of Bihar on-Government Elementary Schools, Section 7 of the Act, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 7, Section 8, Section 8, Section 19-A, Section 19-A, Section 20, Section 21, Section 22, Section 19-A, Section 1(3, Section 7-A, Section 16, Section 1(5, Section 1 of the Act, Section 16, Section 16, Section 16, Section 1(5, Act 16 of 1971, Section 1, the P.F. Act

PERSON: Dharmadhikaari B.P., para 26(2, Legal Adviser under, V.R. Thakur, A. Advocate Thakur, Legal Adviser of, Legal Adviser, Legal Adviser, Legal Adviser, L.L.J. 301, Smt, Legal Adviser, Tarit Ranjan Das, L.J., L.J. Soft, Petitioners, Trustees, Udaipur, Sandip Dwellers, P.M. Patel v. Union, L.L.J., Mazdoor Sangha v. Union, Nagpur Glass Works v., L.L.J. 301, Legal Adviser, Orissa, Gopinath Dash, Casual, P.M. Patel, Sandeep Dwellers, Sandeep Dwellers, Goa, para 26(2, Legal Adviser, P.M. Patel, Legal Adviser, Legal Adviser, B. Petitioners, L.J., L.J. Soft, A.P. Jaiswal, Delhi, Bench, Bench, Bench, Bench, Bench, Bench, Bench, Bench, Bench, Thakur, Thakur, Smt, Tarit Ranjan, Legal Adviser, L.L.J., Mazdoor Sangha v. Union, Legal Adviser, L.L.J. 301, Nagpur Glass Works v., Kumar Sharma, Upendra Sinai v. Union, Ordinance, Lordships, Henry VIII Clause, English King, Orissa, Gopinath Dash, Smt, Tarit Ranjan, Thakur, Gazette, Gazette, Petitioners, P.M. Patel

NORP: J.1, D., Trustees, Maharashtra, Joint, Indian, Indian, Petitioners

CARDINAL: three, 36, 1, 369, only one, 3, one, 26, 26, 26(2, 2, 2, 369, 26, 1995(II, 360, 369, 11, 1988(II, 657, 1960(I, 1987(32)ELT8(SC, 2003)11SCC658, 1997)IILLJ749SC, 2001(Supp, 414, 2001(3, 532, 2001(8, 11, 6, 98, 1971)ILLJ416SC, 2001]248ITR338(SC, 152, 983, 1993(I, 311, 26, 26, 1995(II, 360, 369, 690, one, 26, 26, 6, 98, 26, 966(12, 2001)ILLJ840SC, 6, 12, 15, 26(2, 152, 17.4, 20 and 22, 1965(I, 32, 1965(II, 704, 334, 1960(I, 26, 29/5/2000, 2, 26, 2, 3, 5, 5000/, 30, 36, 1966]1SCR543, 14, 2004)1SCC126, 26(2, 26, 26, 6, 98, 2006)IILLJ1109Bom, 9, 8, 1986)ILLJ155SC, 26, 6, 983, 1993(I, 311, 12, 13, 2001)ILLJ840SC, 6, 1952.In, 13, one, 1, 2, 1974)ILLJ367SC, 26, 13, 690, 146, 23/, 2001(Supp, 414, 2001(3, 532, 2001(8, 11, 1, 12, 13, 24):24, 24-25, two, 2001]248ITR338(SC, 8/2/1994, 3, 2, 1971)ILLJ416SC, 26, 1995(II, 360, 26, 369, 26, 1987(32)ELT8(SC, 2003)11SCC658, 1997)IILLJ749SC, 20 and 22, 1965(I, 32, 1965(II, 704, 18, 19, 21, 24, 1988(II, 657, 39, 40, 1960(I, 1951]2SCR747, one, 849, 1975]98ITR209(SC, 1975]98ITR209(SC, one, 10, 1987(32)ELT8(SC, 2003)11SCC658, 1997)IILLJ749SC, 22, 2, 23/12/1994.8A., 16.2, 12, 19, 2001)ILLJ840SC, 360, 12, 17, 1971)ILLJ416SC, 7, 9, one, 983, 1993(I, 311, 9, 12, 152, 5, two, 13, 14, two, two, 3, 7, less than 15, 4, 8, 9

DATE: 2593/ 1997, 1952, 1952, 1952, 23/12/1994, 17/4/1995, 1952, 29 August, 1998, 2047/1996, 23rd December, 1994, 23rd September, 1980, daily, 17/7/1996, 1064/2001, November 98 to April 2000, 1952, 1990, the beginning of the month, six months, less than 60 days, the period of three months, 16 January 1981, six months, 'three months', 1/11/1990, 1064/ 2001, 2047/1996, 22/6/1995, 8/2/ 1994, every day, 23/12/1994, 23/12/1994, 13th August 2004, 1993, 1952, 1995, 1988, daily, 30 days, 45 days, 2006)IILLJ1109Bom, 23/3/2005, 2004, 1164/ 2001, 16, 1986)ILLJ88SC, a month, 1064/2001, 15 to 20 days, the year, 1952, 2593/1997, 2047/1996, today, 1953, 1/7/1997, 8/2/1994, 23/12/1994, daily, 1952, 1986)ILLJ88SC, 1980, 6543/1996, 6542/1996, 1079/ 2003, 11 June 2003, 2411 of 2000, 2411 of 2000, 13/ 8/2004, 1952, 5th October 2000, 1997-98, 1998-99, 1990, 98, up little later, 23/12/ 1994, 1986)ILLJ88SC, 1988, 1944, 2001, 23/12/ 1994, years, 44, August 19, 1959 and, September 21,1959, March 7, 1957, December 10, 1957, 1952, March 31, 1953, 1953, March 31, 1953, August 19, 1959, 1990, 1988, 23/12/ 1994, 1964, 8/2/1994, 23/12/1994, 8/2/ 1994 on 23/12/1994, 5 of 1982, 1981, 1912, 1947, 1950, 30 of 1976, eleven years, 2005, 21, 1/7/1997, 1988, three years, 1986)ILLJ88SC, a few days, 2411 of 2000, 13/8/2004, two or three days, 1952, the year, 360 days, one year, 1986, L.I.C. 1402, the year, 360 days, 1990, 1990, a day, a few days, month, a day, a day, 1997, 1/4/1971, less than one year, one year, 23/4/1971

ORG: Builders Association of India, Petitioners against Union of India, the Central Provident Fund, Provident Fund Scheme, Employees Provident Funds & Misc, Joint, Nagpur, Provident Fund, Petitioners, Honble Apex Court, J.P. Tobacco Products, v. Union of India, Provident Fund Scheme, Court, Petitioners, Joint, Central Government, M/s. R.B., Court & this Court, Sandeep Dwellers Private Ltd, P.F., Apex Court, J.P. Tobacco Products, v. Union of India, W.P., Advocate Sunderam, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Khemchand Motilal Tobaco Products Ltd and Ors, v. Union of India the Division Bench, Division Bench, Honble Apex Court, J.P. Tobacco Products, v. Union of India, the Honble Apex Court, Apex Court, Central Government, Central Government, Joint, Government of India, Central Government, Thakur, Delhi High Court, Wire Netting Stores v. Regional Provident Fund, Division Bench, Court, L.L.N., Mandovi Pellets Ltd v. Union of India, Honble Apex Court, Kuntesh v. Management of Hindu Kanya Mahavidyalaya, Joint, Union of India, Honble Apex Court, Union of India, Division Bench, Additional Collector of Central Excise, Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, T.S. Hariharan's, Honble Apex Court, The Provident Fund Inspector, T.S. Hariharan, Appellate Authority, Joint, Indra Industries, Learned Single, Court, Michigan Engineering Private Ltd., Union of India, Provident Fund Act, Court, Honble Apex Court, The Provident Fund Inspector, T.S. Hariharan, Employees, State, Division Bench, Karnataka High Court, Jyothi Home Industries v., Regional Provident Fund, Division Bench, Rajasthan High Court, Cotton Corporation v. Union of India, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Khemchand Motilal Tobaco Products Ltd., Ors, v. Union of India, Division Bench, Honble Apex Court, J.P. Tobacco Products, v. Union of India, the Honble Apex Court, T.S. Hariharan, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Honble Apex Court, Honble Apex Court, T.S. Hariharan, High Courts, Jyothi Home Industries, Cotton Corporation, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Division Bench, Orissa High Court, National Highway Division v., Regional Provident Fund, Petitioners, Scheme, P.F. Contribution, P.F., Honble Apex Court, A.I. Construction, union v. Union of India, the Honble Apex Court, P.F., the Honble Apex Court, Central Board of Trustees, Provident Fund, High Courts, Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Forest Development Corporation, Maharashtra v. Regional Provident Fund, Appellate Authority, T.S. Hariharan's, Appellate Tribunal, BSNL, Regional Provident Fund, Honble Apex Court, Food Corporation of India v. Provident Fund, W.P., S.K. Nasiruddin Beedi Merchants v., Central Provident Fund, Rajasthan High Court, Cotton Corporation v. Union of India, Honble Apex Court, Ramsingh v. Union of India, Honble Apex Court, High Courts, Karnataka High Court, Jyothi Home Industries v., Regional Provident Fund, Court, Scheme, the Competent Authority, Mysore High Court, Wadi Capstone Marketing Co., Regional Provident Fund, Rajasthan High Court, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Nazeena Traders, Regional Provident Fund, Bombay High Court, Regional Provident Fund, the instance of department, Honble Apex Court, T.S. Hariharan, Honble Apex Court, State, Court, P.F. Act, Honble Apex Court, Sons v. Union of India, Petitioners, Division Bench, Madhya Pradesh High Court, C.L.R. 360, Khemchand Motilal, Union of India, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Court, M.P. High Court, Haryana High Court, Employs State Insurance Corporation, Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd, Karnataka High Court, H.G. Shirke Construction v. Union of India, Builders Association of India, High Court, Bhandari Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, Court, Michigan Engineers Private Ltd., Writ Petition, Provident Fund Inspector, Petitioners, Court, Court, Court, CBT, P.F. Act, Hon'ble Apex Court, The Corporation of Calcutta, Hon Apex Court, Ramsingh v. Union of India, Court, Michigan Engineers Private Limited v. Union of India, Michigan Engineers, T.S. Hariharan, High Court, Court, Hon Apex Court, Appellate Tribunal, T.S. Hariharan, Authority, Appellate Authority, Appellate Authority, Forest Development Corporation, Maharashtra v. Regional Provident Fund, Court, Michigan Engineers, Court, Hon Apex Court, T.S. Hariharan, P.F. Act, Court, The Supreme Court, Company, Hon Apex Court, T.S. Hariharan (supra).9, the Area Enforcement Officer, Court, The Provident Fund, The Supreme Court, Andhra University v. Regional Provident Fund, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Scheme, High Court, Hon Apex Court, T.S. Hariharan, Scheme, Appellate Tribunal/authority, Hon Apex Court, T.S. Hariharan, Rajasthan High Court, Cotton Corporation v. Union of India, Apex Court, S.K. Nasiruddin Beedi Merchants v., Central Provident Fund, Apex Court, Hon Apex Court, The Hon Apex Court, P.F. Act, Michigan Engineers, Division Bench, Rajasthan High Court, the Central Government, Central Government, Division Bench, Central Government, Central Government, Hon Apex Court, S.K. Nasiruddin Beedi Merchants, Counsel for Petitioner, Joint, M/s. Builders Association of India, Central Provident Fund, All India Construction Workers Union, Hon Apex Court, Mangalore Ganesh Beedi Works v. Union of India, Orissa High Court, Executive Engineer National Highway Division v. Regional Provident Fund, L.I.C., Karnataka High Court, Jyothi Home Industries, L.L.N., the Government of India, Regional Provident Fund Commissioners, the Legal Adviser, Central Government, Joint, Government of India, Division Bench, Court, Sunflag Iron and Steel Company Ltd., Additional Collector of Central Excise, Assessee/Petitioner, Court, Central Excises & Salt Act, Circulars/Orders and Trade, Circular, The Supreme Court, Government of Andhra Pradesh and Ors, A.I.R., the Supreme Court, Vide, Courts, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Judicial Forum, Court, Court, the Superior Courts, Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Circular/, Division Bench, Court, Yashwant Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Union of India, Hon Apex Court, Sales Tax v., Indra Industries, P.F. Act, The Central Government, the Central Government, 1971)IILLJ513SC Union of India, Ogale Glass Works Ltd., the Hon Apex Court, the Central Government, the Bombay High Court, the High Court, the Central Government, Court, the Central Government, The Central Government, the Bombay High Court, the Regional Provident Fund Com, Scheme, Scheme, Hurricane Lanterns, Stoves, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Scheme, the Bombay High Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Bombay High Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Provident Fund, the Regional Provident Fund, the Hon Apex Court, P.F. Act, The Provident Fund Inspector, T.S. Hariharan, Hon Apex Court, Division Bench, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Khemchand Motilal Tobaco Products Ltd and Ors, v. Union of India, Division Bench, Hon Apex Court, J.P. Tobacco Products, v. Union of India, the Hon Apex Court, T.S. Hariharan, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Hon Apex Court, Kuntesh v. Management of Hindu Kanya Mahavidyalaya, Union of India, Union of India, D. Advocate Sunderam, P.F. Department, Joint, Wadi Capstone Marketing Co (, Regional Provident Fund, Central Government, Madras High Court, East India Industries, Regional Provident Fund, Rajasthan High Court, the Central Government, Sunderam, Central Government, Central Government, Central Government, Court, Thakur, Delhi High Court, Wire Netting Stores v. Regional Provident Fund, Central Government, the Central Government, Central Government, Courts, Civil Courts, High Courts, Supreme Court, Central Government, Court, L.L.N., Mandovi Pellets Ltd., Union of India, Court, Central Government, Regional Provident Fund, Central Government, Hon Apex Court, Apex Court, Hon Apex Court, U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission, Selection Board Act, U.P. Section 33, the State Government, Hon Apex Court, Commission, Commission, the Selection Boards, Commission, Boards, Court, AIR, Court, Bills, Court, Parliament, State, the Union of India, Patna High Court, Krishnadeo Misra, State, the State Government, Legislature, Hon Apex Court, Parliament, Lordships, State, Central Government, Hon Apex Court, Patna High Court, Central Government, Hon Apex Court, State, Kuntesh v. Management of Hindu Kanya Mahavidyalaya, Union of India, Union of India, Central Government, the Central Board, Central Board, Central Government, Central Government, each House of Parliament, Labour, Court, Hon Apex Court, Karnataka High Court, Jyothi Home Industries, Rajasthan High Court, Cotton Corporation, Division Bench, Orissa High Court, Executive Engineer, National Highway Division, Hon Apex Court, P.M. Patel & Sons v. Union of India, bee, S.K. Nasiruddin Beedi Merchants v., Central Provident Fund, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Union of India, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Nazeena Traders, Regional Provident Fund, Advocate Sunderam, P.F. Act, Court, Michigan Engineers Private Limited v. Union of India, Counsel for department, T.S. Hariharan, Appellate Tribunal, Hon Apex Court, The Provident Fund Inspector, T.S. Hariharan, the Hon Apex Court, Government, the High Court, Rajasthan High Court, Cotton Corporation v. Union of India, Provident Fund, Delhi High Court, Eastern Arts Corporation, S.P. Mehrotra, Hon Apex Court, Sons v. Union of India, Lordships of the Supreme Court, Scheme, Lordships of the Supreme Court, T.S. Hariharan, the Hon Supreme Court, the Hon Supreme Court, the Hon Supreme Court, The Hon Supreme Court, the Hon Supreme Court, the Apex Court, Hon Supreme Court, T.S. Hariharan, Karnataka High Court, Jyothi Home Industries v., Regional Provident Fund, Division Bench, Rajasthan High Court, Karnataka High Court, Scheme, Scheme, Hon Apex Court, T.S. Hariharan, the Provident Fund Scheme, Scheme, the Hon Apex Court, T.S. Hariharan, Hon Apex Court, Central Government or State Government, Hon, Apex Court, Hon Apex Court, P.F. Act, The Hon Apex Court, Hon Apex Court, The Hon Apex Court, Hon Apex Court, The Hon Apex Court

GPE: Mumbai, C.L.R., C.L.R., Advocate, C.L.R., C.L.R., C.R., Guntur, Guntur, C.L.R., C.L.R., States, P.F., Employee, Tobaco, Bombay, Review, C.R., Assessee, S.I. Rooplal, Clauses, Clauses, Bombay, Us, Guntur, C.L.R., C.L.R., S.C.R., Mahadeva, Madeva, T.S., C.L.R., Khemchand, Tobaco, Bombay, P.F., Provident

PRODUCT: Para 26(2, ATA - 9, Orders 6/5/98, 101, Circulars, Hon Full Bench, the Full Bench, Amending Act 33 of 1988, Bench, Appellant

EVENT: P.F. Act, P.F. Act, W.P. 2047/1996, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, W.P. 1164/2001, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act reads:19-A. Power, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act, P.F. Act

ORDINAL: third, 134th, first, first, second, First, first, first

TIME: under PF Act, 1991ECR147(Bombay, about a couple of hours, couple of hours

WORK_OF_ART: Legal Adviser, Date 23/12/1994, 5/2/1991, Honble Full Bench of Punjab, 8/2/1994, 8/2/1994, Bench, Legal Adviser, 8/2/1994, The Ajmer Merwara (Extension of Laws) Act

FAC: Bombay Bench

LOC: Single, Single, Single, Executive