Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner, Sangli Miraj Kupwad Cities Municipal Corporation Vs. Bhide and Sons Pvt. Ltd.
Decided On : Oct-17-2006
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Section 105 of the Act, Section 169 of the Act, Section 172 of the Act, Section 169 of the Act, Section 105 of the Act, Section 169, Section 172 of the Act, Section 169 of the Act, Section 169, Section 9, Section 406, Section 406, Section 169, Section 172
PERSON: Karnik D.G., Walawalkar, Octroi, Patil, Walawalkar, Counsel
NORP: J.1
DATE: 12th February 2004, 1965, 1,489/-, 22nd March 1983, about 12th November 1987, 1,489.85, 2,657/-, 1911, 1965, 1987, 24th April 1995, 1949
ORDINAL: 3rd, first
ORG: Sangli, Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Court, the District Court, the Civil Court, Municipal Council, the Civil Court, Court, the Appellate Court, the Civil Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Civil Court, Judicial Magistrate, a Civil Court, the Supreme Court, NDMC, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court in Administrator, Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd., the Bombay Provincial Corporation Act, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations, Court
CARDINAL: 1,630/-against, 1,489.85, 86, 172
GPE: Satish Chand
FAC: Sections 84
LOC: Municipal Act.12