Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jyoti Laxman Konkar Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Decided On : Jul-10-2006

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 260A(1, the IT Act, Section 133A of the Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 133A, Section 139(5, Section 271(1)(c

PERSON: N.A. Britto, S.V. Pikale, S.R. Rivonkar, Chandra Mittal, Chandra Mittal, S.V. Pikale, S.R. Rivonkar, K.P. Sampath Reddy, Rice Mill v., Anr

NORP: J.1

DATE: 1961, 25th Nov., 1999, 1999-2000, May, 2001, 21st Sept., 2001, Jan., 2006, 2000

ORG: AO, AO, AO, CIT, CIT, CIT, the Supreme Court, CIT, the Tribunal (Income-tax, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, AO, AO, Reliance, Century Flour Mills Ltd., CIT, CTR, SC, CIT, Rhone Poulenc Ltd., CIT, Court, Tribunal, Court, the Karnataka High Court, ITO, K.C. Builders, Asstt, CIT, the Supreme Court, CIT, Allahabad High Court, West Bengal State Electricity Board, CIT, Calcutta High Court, AO, AO, Tribunal, CIT, the Division Bench of, Madhya Pradesh High Court

CARDINAL: 2,75,000, 2000]241ITR124(MP, 2001]251ITR9(SC, 162, 407, 2000]246ITR699(Bom, 1992]197ITR232(KAR, 2004]265ITR562(SC, 2005]278ITR599(All, 2005]278ITR218(Cal

ORDINAL: 2nd, second, first, second, third, first

GPE: assessee

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //