Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Jyoti Laxman Konkar Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Decided On : Jul-10-2006
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Section 260A(1, the IT Act, Section 133A of the Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 133A, Section 139(5, Section 271(1)(c
PERSON: N.A. Britto, S.V. Pikale, S.R. Rivonkar, Chandra Mittal, Chandra Mittal, S.V. Pikale, S.R. Rivonkar, K.P. Sampath Reddy, Rice Mill v., Anr
NORP: J.1
DATE: 1961, 25th Nov., 1999, 1999-2000, May, 2001, 21st Sept., 2001, Jan., 2006, 2000
ORG: AO, AO, AO, CIT, CIT, CIT, the Supreme Court, CIT, the Tribunal (Income-tax, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, AO, AO, Reliance, Century Flour Mills Ltd., CIT, CTR, SC, CIT, Rhone Poulenc Ltd., CIT, Court, Tribunal, Court, the Karnataka High Court, ITO, K.C. Builders, Asstt, CIT, the Supreme Court, CIT, Allahabad High Court, West Bengal State Electricity Board, CIT, Calcutta High Court, AO, AO, Tribunal, CIT, the Division Bench of, Madhya Pradesh High Court
CARDINAL: 2,75,000, 2000]241ITR124(MP, 2001]251ITR9(SC, 162, 407, 2000]246ITR699(Bom, 1992]197ITR232(KAR, 2004]265ITR562(SC, 2005]278ITR599(All, 2005]278ITR218(Cal
ORDINAL: 2nd, second, first, second, third, first
GPE: assessee